[cisco-voip] session target dns

2018-03-05 Thread Ed Leatherman
Hi everyone, Hopefully a quick question - in a dial-peer on CUBE (16.3.5) how does session target dns: resolve to an IP? I've never used DNS as target before for this. Does CUBE just do a query for the A record by default, or does it do a SRV query by default? I have a SIP provider that wants to

Re: [cisco-voip] session target dns

2018-03-05 Thread Loren Hillukka
You can have your gw query your DNS server, and you have to add SRV records to your central DNS server (like with the jabber entries required to get jabber sign-in to work). Here’s the example of doing local DNS to static entries on the gateway itself, from the CVP 10 config guide. CVP is where

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 173, Issue 3

2018-03-05 Thread Pawlowski, Adam
Ed, Caveat on all this that I set this up a year or two ago so I could be wrong on some parts: This does DNS SRV lookup I believe first, then A. As long as you're in an IOS version that supports SRV as that appeared somewhere in 15 I believe. We are running 15.(4)3 M2. I set up a number of SR

Re: [cisco-voip] session target dns

2018-03-05 Thread Anthony Holloway
Loren, Just out of curiosity, why didn't you just use session server groups? Based on the config you shared, it looks like it would achieve the same thing, but with less config, and not adding in the DNS stack within IOS. Ed, *Note, you cannot use DNS in server groups, so it's one or the other.

Re: [cisco-voip] Need help configuring router for 911 with POTS Lines connected to FXO port on the router

2018-03-05 Thread Hamu Ebiso
Thank you Anthony very much. I really appreciated your guidance. I was able to make work with the sip setup and incoming calls are now working fine but it doesn't have caller ID. I have attached the logs. below is the config. control-plane ! ! voice-port 0/2/0 trunk-group FXO_EM no battery-

Re: [cisco-voip] session target dns

2018-03-05 Thread Loren Hillukka
Local dns srv allowed priority and weight, whereas server-group only allowed priority, that I recall. Granted, you don't usually need weight, but some customers desired that option. Either can be used, and server-groups do add some benefits (can see better up/down status, etc). Lately I have mov

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 173, Issue 3

2018-03-05 Thread Loren Hillukka
Nice tips Adam. The failovers to active endpoints was a pain. That retry invites 2 was a must - the default was 6. Loren > On Mar 5, 2018, at 1:14 PM, Pawlowski, Adam wrote: > > Ed, > > Caveat on all this that I set this up a year or two ago so I could be wrong > on some parts: > > This

Re: [cisco-voip] session target dns

2018-03-05 Thread Anthony Holloway
Makes sense Loren. Thanks for clarifying. And by ping group, do you mean using voice class sip-options-keepalive On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:51 PM Loren Hillukka wrote: > Local dns srv allowed priority and weight, whereas server-group only > allowed priority, that I recall. Granted, you don't u