Re: [cisco-voip] e911

It would be the PSTN carrier the Spark customer is using, that would ultimately provide the PSAP routing. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/unified-communications/hosted-collaboration-solution-hcs/datasheet-c78-736823.html My thought is, what if anything, will this change for Sp

[cisco-voip] Connection Bug (can cuase message loss)

Good morning all, I'm currently working with TAC trying to resolve an issue with our Unity Connection HA cluster, and it looks like we've narrowed it down to a couple of bugs. Saved messages are broken/missing at random on one appliance or the other. The impacted message volume seems to be

[cisco-voip] Jabber 11.9.3 new install parameter CLICK2X=Click2call

Hallo Group Has anyone an idea, what this install parameter changes in the registry? There must be some changes on the Protocol handlers (eg tel: or callto:) In the Deployment Guide there is a note, that this parameter enables Click to call in the browser. However I installed Jabber with this par

Re: [cisco-voip] e911

Great points Ryan. We have a standard 9-1-1 disclaimer in our scopes (as I’m sure many VARs do), though it primarily focuses on location and alerting versus access. I would imagine it would now also need to include reference to this mandate prohibiting restrictions to direct access of 9-1-1

Re: [cisco-voip] e911

If it helps to have another resource, our company’s OneView CDR & Analytics solution for Cisco Call Manager has a popularly implemented report for notifying of any 911 calls that happen. It can be an alert triggered immediately – or it can be configured to run periodic reports one can tell who

[cisco-voip] CA Certs applied to CUCM & IMP

Just completed a new build of CUCM and IM&P to 11.5.1 SU4, I then generated Multi SAN Tomcat certs and applied these to the servers which are working fine when I browse to any of the nodes. Since applying the certs the the nodes under the DefaultSubCluster on the presence Topology page are showing

Re: [cisco-voip] CA Certs applied to CUCM & IMP

Hey Nick, Check the root CA cert in your trust store. Is it signed with MD5withRSA? The Java system built into CUCM dropped support for this cert signing algorithm after CUCM 11.0. We had the same issue and it was a hard stop because it broke AXL integration with UCCX while upgrading 11.0 to

Re: [cisco-voip] CA Certs applied to CUCM & IMP

You didn't mention it, so maybe you forgot to also do the IM&P cup-xmpp cert in additional to Tomcat? On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:17 PM Nick via cisco-voip < cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> wrote: > Just completed a new build of CUCM and IM&P to 11.5.1 SU4, I then > generated Multi SAN Tomcat certs and

Re: [cisco-voip] session target dns

Follow-up to this SRV/CUBE topic.. Outbound calls work fine with this setup (after I enabled ip domain-lookup ;-) ) For inbound calls, the service provider is using the hostname for the SRV record (peer.isc.lumos.net) in the contact field of the invite. Apparently, CUBE only does an A record look

Re: [cisco-voip] Automated PSTN ingress call regression testing?

Thanks. I am aware of the multiple carriers... but I think being able to cover the edge services would be a huge help in this situation. I'm just anticipating what they will ask for. I kind of cast a wide net with this email because I was not sure what kind of services were out there. If some provi

Re: [cisco-voip] Automated PSTN ingress call regression testing?

I have seen Hammer used for inbound call verification before: http://www.empirix.com/products/hammer/ -Wes On Mar 8, 2018, at 3:13 PM, Nick Barnett mailto:nicksbarn...@gmail.com>> wrote: Thanks. I am aware of the multiple carriers... but I think being able to cover the edge services would be

Re: [cisco-voip] Automated PSTN ingress call regression testing?

Startrinity is a pretty awesome tool. Not free but has pretty amazing capabilities. Loren On Mar 8, 2018, at 2:17 PM, Wes Sisk (wsisk) mailto:ws...@cisco.com>> wrote: I have seen Hammer used for inbound call verification before: http://www.empirix.com/products/hammer/ -Wes On Mar 8, 2018, a

Re: [cisco-voip] Automated PSTN ingress call regression testing?

Hi Nick, We (UnifiedFX) are exposing AXL/JTAPI and a few other CUCM API’s via a simple REST API and have created a Python SDK to make it easy to get up and running. AutomationFX Overview and placeholder for further libraries/docs: https://github.com/unifiedfx/awesome-automationfx AutomationFX P

Re: [cisco-voip] CA Certs applied to CUCM & IMP

Hi Anthony, forgot to mention it yes, cup-xmpp was also added at the same time. On 8 March 2018 at 18:48, Anthony Holloway wrote: > You didn't mention it, so maybe you forgot to also do the IM&P cup-xmpp > cert in additional to Tomcat? > > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:17 PM Nick via cisco-voip < >

Re: [cisco-voip] CA Certs applied to CUCM & IMP

You will get a good understanding of whats happening by running the command 'file list activelog tomcat/logs/cupadmin/log4j date detail' and then 'file tail activelog tomcat/logs/cupadmin/log4j/cupadminX.log' where cupadminX.log is the latest file from the first output. Then visiting the pa

Re: [cisco-voip] CA Certs applied to CUCM & IMP

Actually, just put "recent" at the end of your tail command. On Mar 8, 2018 4:35 PM, "Daniel" wrote: > You will get a good understanding of whats happening by running the > command 'file list activelog tomcat/logs/cupadmin/log4j date detail' and > then 'file tail activelog tomcat/logs/cupadmin/l

Re: [cisco-voip] CA Certs applied to CUCM & IMP

That works great! So Nick, run the command 'file tail activelog tomcat/logs/cupadmin/log4j recent' and then visit the Cluster Topology page. On 9/3/18 11:40 am, Anthony Holloway wrote: > Actually, just put "recent" at the end of your tail command.  > > On Mar 8, 2018 4:35 PM, "Daniel"