I haven't tried... Can you do two Unified Comm zones to a single CUCM?
From: Brian Meade
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 3:46 PM
To: Mark H. Turpin
Cc: Gerence Guan ; Anthony Holloway
; cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway Cluster failover
I don't believe running unclustered is supported though.
The way I interpreted this section in Unsupported Deployments:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/expressway/config_guide/X12-6/exwy_b_mra-expressway-deployment-guide/exwy_b_mra-expressway-deployment-guide_chapter_011.html
Quick update from the 911 geek on the list ICYMI -
https://help.webex.com/en-us/av6oo3/RedSky-Emergency-911-Service-for-Webex-Calling
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Another reason to go to 12.5 ->
https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-uccx-rce-GMSC6RKN
From: cisco-voip on behalf of Jason Aarons
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2020 10:18 AM
To: Lelio Fulgenzi
Cc: Cisco VoIP List
Subject:
Hey folks,
Been spending a lot of time thinking about the significant problem facing
US-based businesses to get compliant with the existing and upcoming laws re:
911, and the capabilities available in the ng911 platform. We're trying to come
up with a way to make it easy/ier for voice
Teams
client doesn't have location awareness like Jabber, to my knowledge.
From: Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 1:17 PM
To: Mark H. Turpin ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: ng911
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL - DO NOT CLICK LINKS ***
Wouldn’t
20 8:56 AM
To: Mark H. Turpin ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: ng911
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL - DO NOT CLICK LINKS ***
It is on the list of considerations for sure.
If I’m reading (skimmed) Microsoft’s document you linked, this works more or
less how the traditional E911 systems work, an
to make this work
out of the box.
Ugh.
From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of Mark H.
Turpin
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2020 3:15 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] ng911
Is anyone thinking about NG911 compatibility for pure Teams/Webex cloud
calling? I understand Intrado
Is anyone thinking about NG911 compatibility for pure Teams/Webex cloud
calling? I understand Intrado/RedSky offerings for CER/on-prem/Jabber/hybrid
calling.
The Webex Calling terms
+1 on Imagicle's fax server. Xmedius and RightFax are more money, however, all
three work great.
From: cisco-voip on behalf of Anthony
Holloway
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 10:55 AM
To: Terry Oakley
Cc: voyp list, cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)
Oh that's awesome. *face palm*
From: Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Sunday, April 5, 2020 12:23 PM
To: Mark H. Turpin
Cc: Anthony Holloway ; cisco-voip voyp list
; Jonatan Quezada ;
Adrian Arevalo-Orozco
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] [EXTERNAL] Cost-Effective Public
I’m using namecheap and have for years. Cheap certs from Comodo and they work
fine. You can do email, web, and DNS validation -
https://www.namecheap.com/support/knowledgebase/article.aspx/9637/68/how-can-i-complete-the-domain-control-validation-dcv-for-my-ssl-certificate
Sorry, I missed the
Terry,
You've got everything you need to do video meetings quite well the only concern
might be the capacity with your on-prem CWMS. Do you feel you have sufficient
capacity ports/processor-wise for your user community?
There are free 90-day Webex trials you could stand up in the cloud if
It will not automatically revoke them. There is no phone-home mechanism, today,
for the TMS/Expressway to invalidate the licenses.
—
Mark Turpin
Contact me on Webex Teams
mtur...@covene.com / +1-314-297-0770
> On Feb 5, 2020, at 3:17 PM, UC Penguin wrote:
>
> *** EXTERNAL EMAIL - DO NOT
Lelio,
Great thinking, I had not considered this. Initial thoughts are I would not
want accessories like a headset to be able to answer a call on my locked
computer. But on the flip side, I also have a hard phone on my desk, and
someone could pick up the handset with ease.
If they were to
Something to try might be auto cut through on the voice-port.
The next thing I'd expect to see after receiving "2475" is
E_HTSP_VOICE_CUT_THROUGH and we don't see that. It just seems to hang at digit
collection.
From: cisco-voip on behalf of Jonathan
Charles
Does the problem go away if you force an MTP?
Can you provide a debug ccsip messages of an external call?
Can you share your sanitized CUBE config?
Curious if your call/media is changing after the initial announcement and your
ITSP doesn't care for the way you're attempting to change it.
Greetings all,
Anyone tinkering with Jabber VDI + Dell Wyse ThinOS + Horizon?
It appears Dell has released in version 8.6 of ThinOS support for JVDI
w/Citrix, but I cannot find anything about support for VMware or Blast.
https://dell.to/336QAIg < JVDI on Citrix
https://dell.to/2oxk1UU < S4B on
Don't believe it changed from 7 -> 8.5/6 which is published now. Option 4 > 1
8.6 guide -
https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity_exp/rel8_6/quick/voicemail/enu/86vq_enu.pdf
Here's a cached version of the 7.x guide for the TUI on google:
https://bit.ly/2puxk9d
Ray,
I haven’t tested this, but a back of the napkin design might be:
Use a route next hop by calling party translation for your VM pilot.
If a call matches the extensions of executives, then it could goto a different
route pattern, like *.
Then you can mask at the route pattern or RL/RG
Lelio,
Your partner can immediately assign new admins if staff changes occur within
the partner organization.
We typically assign 4 people as customer admins so various folks can be
available to assist, and it prevents a spof.
—
Mark Turpin
Contact me on Cisco WebEx Teams:
21 matches
Mail list logo
