Re: [cisco-voip] call forward is not working in this scenario

that? It would be great if you had more details about it. My google searching has turned up nothing so far. On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 11:35 AM Norton, Mike mailto:mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca>> wrote: I haven’t been into CUCM in ages, but there used to be a secret field in some advanced area I

Re: [cisco-voip] call forward is not working in this scenario

I haven’t been into CUCM in ages, but there used to be a secret field in some advanced area I forget the name of, where you could type in the name of a particular Cisco Bug ID, and then when you go to a hunt pilot there will magically be call forwarding settings there that you can specify

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Spark/Hybrid Cloud to CUCM call failes

most common reason for these in my experience is a missing or incorrect > inbound CSS on the sip trunk(s) between cloud & prem. > > > >> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020, 7:10 AM Mike O wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I've racked my brain on this. I cannot get a call fro

[cisco-voip] Cisco Spark/Hybrid Cloud to CUCM call failes

can ping and resolve cluster1.domain.com (which is the pub). Thanks, Mike [cid:b0c349d7-6975-4826-8ade-c5eb317b20ad] ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] [External] Re: certificate renewals - 1 year only - due to Apple changes

for various popular external boxes into their utilities. They will have to start doing more value-add type of stuff like that if they want to remain of value in the face of free alternatives. -mn From: Hunter Fuller Sent: March 4, 2020 11:56 AM To: Lelio Fulgenzi Cc: Norton, Mike ; voyp list, cisco

Re: [cisco-voip] certificate renewals - 1 year only - due to Apple changes

If two years from now, a product that needs public certificates still doesn't support automated renewals, then it's a terrible product you should have migrated away from two years earlier. The writing has been on the wall for a long time. But even for developers who've had their heads in sand,

Re: [cisco-voip] HTTP Response for HTTP Triggered Script

I know nothing about UCCX, but from an HTTP perspective, the problem does not quite make sense as described. If the HTTP server is “spitting back some HTML” then it had to have also spit back a status code. The status code is in the HTTP response headers before the content. Content cannot

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber MRA with Cisco Umbrella

Have never used Umbrella for external clients, but I would be very surprised if it somehow magically exposed your “local” domains to external clients. Internal clients use the internal Umbrella virtual appliance to resolve names, and if the request is for a domain defined as “local”, the

Re: [cisco-voip] refining dial peers for Fax

Ryan Huff wrote: > Yes, the handshake “noise” samples, so to speak (RTP payload) in a fax over > SIP will always be UDP; the signaling (SIP) could be TCP or UDP. If you do > have a poor connection, you could lose signaling due to packet loss, and the > connection terminate (whereas TCP would

Re: [cisco-voip] Teradici Zero Client packet loss when connected through Phones

We have some Teradici Zero Clients, and began to have issues with them last year. We ended up hard coding them to 100/Full, and our issues went away. We did have a different use case, as we were having the zero clients at the end of runs, not plugged into a device with what has to be less than

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO hang due to connectivity loss?

Are you sure that the gateway is properly detecting the tone and hanging up when connectivity *is* working? FXO disconnect is terribly hit-and-miss even at the best of times. Disconnect supervision on FXO is more of a best-effort attempt than an actual thing. If the disconnect signal is

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port ignore incoming

. Still feels like there should be a better way though... is it really that unusual to want to use a port only for outgoing? -mn From: Evgeny Izetov [mailto:eize...@gmail.com] Sent: December 7, 2017 5:36 PM To: Norton, Mike <mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca> Cc: Brian Meade <bmead...@vt.edu>; Cisc

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port ignore incoming

that calls don’t all show up at the PBX twice. -mn From: bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade Sent: December 7, 2017 1:08 PM To: Norton, Mike <mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port ignore incoming OPX to

[cisco-voip] FXO port ignore incoming

I need to make an FXO port ignore incoming calls. I.e., don't take the trunk off-hook, and don't make any phones ring. Just let the trunk keep ringing indefinitely. What is the best way to accomplish this? I could swear I've done this before, but I'm drawing a blank at the moment... connection

Re: [cisco-voip] e164 dialplan conversion

I haven’t been into CUCM for a while so maybe the answer to this is obvious, but do E.164 numbers in CUCM actually have to be entirely numbers? In MS Lync, your E.164 number is more of a “tel:” URI than an actual number. So for phones with no DID, we set them as +1XXXYYY;exten= where

Re: [cisco-voip] Voice and video bandwidth generator

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iperf On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Matthew Collins wrote: > Hi All, > > > > Can anyone recommend a tool that can generate voice and video traffic > between two end point on the correct ports so we can test the networks > performance to

Re: [cisco-voip] authentication failed alerts

Hi Charles, You might want to have your AD guys recheck they're sources. It's a feature from Server 2003, JUST for that reason.

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.5 cluster migration

on the old cluster, but I don't see any reason why they aren't connecting to the TVS. Thanks, Mike From: Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) <rratl...@cisco.com> Sent: Sunday, August 6, 2017 9:53 AM To: Schlotterer, Tommy; Mike O Cc: cisco-voip voyp list Subject: Re:

[cisco-voip] CUCM 10.5 cluster migration

nd add new phones in. I know I can lab this up, but wanted to make sure there were no gotchas associated with this method. Thanks, Mike ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Configure 3845 router for 911 call.

Currently your config will send the 911 calls out the "Local" T1. Once you have the POTS lines added, you will need to put your POTS ports into their own trunk group and direct your outgoing dial-peers to the new trunk group instead of "Local." You should do something with inbound calls that

Re: [cisco-voip] Bogen paging system with TAMB2 and 310 VG.

quot;Norton, Mike" <mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca>, cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: Bogen paging system with TAMB2 and 310 VG. Yes we are using Bogens and in order to make VG work with Bogens, we used TAMB2. The questions were there are already 3 Zones and the customers are looking for

Re: [cisco-voip] Bogen paging system with TAMB2 and 310 VG.

The TAMB doesn’t do zoning – one zone only. If you need zones, then take a look at the Bogen PCM2000 system instead of the TAMB. -mn From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Hamu Ebiso Sent: June 8, 2017 1:22 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject:

Re: [cisco-voip] GLC-TE modules

#_Toc483994126 On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: > Never mind > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jun 1, 2017, at 9:01 AM, Mike King <m...@mpking.com> wrote: > > > > Just wanted to throw an FYI out there for people

[cisco-voip] GLC-TE modules

Just wanted to throw an FYI out there for people. I just ran into this, and it's a mess. Short Answer. Cisco has EOS'd the GLC-T modules (today), and replaced it with the GLC-TE (They increased the operational temperatures) Now the bad news. The GLC-TE's are not on the compatibility matrix

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port ignore battery failure

From: Ben Amick [mailto:bam...@humanarc.com] Sent: May 26, 2017 4:02 PM To: Norton, Mike <mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca>; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: FXO port ignore battery failure That's interesting. All the paging systems I've hooked up in the past I've done via a paging adapter off

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port ignore battery failure

will be able to get the proper module they need by Monday, so I'm not going to bother trying to do the temporary workaround and I'll just do the normal FXO way next week. -mn From: Ben Amick [mailto:bam...@humanarc.com] Sent: May 26, 2017 3:37 PM To: Norton, Mike <mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca>; cisc

[cisco-voip] CUCM 10.5.1 to 10.5.2SU4a confusion.

ger and IM and Presence Service. Thanks, Mike ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Caller ID Manipulation

From: Evgeny Izetov Sent: 17/01/2017 10:31 AM To: Norton, Mike Cc: Alan Libbee; Cisco VoIP Group; Ben Amick Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Caller ID Manipulation You could also look into changing the ASCII Display Name on line appearances as that's what gets sent

Re: [cisco-voip] Caller ID Manipulation

Alan, I think the CNAM database lookup is only U.S. thing. In Canada and presumably elsewhere, the calling name is set by the caller (if ISDN or SIP, otherwise by their CO switch if analog POTS) and is passed all the way through the PSTN to the callee. I’ve never understood why the CUCM web

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP Profile to add Calling Name

Is there a CUBE? You don’t say, but I’m assuming so. I would do something like this on the CUBE: request ANY sip-header From modify "^(.+):.*

Re: [cisco-voip] DNS Friendly Names and URL Paths

rom my Windows Phone From: Anthony Holloway Sent: 20/10/2016 5:05 PM To: Norton, Mike Cc: Cisco VoIP Group Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DNS Friendly Names and URL Paths So the cloud is a scary place, I see that. I wouldn't want to expose anyone to an extra risk.

Re: [cisco-voip] DNS Friendly Names and URL Paths

I would be a bit wary of HTTP redirects being a convenient attack vector for phishing. Especially if they are happening over unencrypted HTTP and across the Internet. But even just behaviorally, I don’t think it is a good practice to get users comfortable seeing the “official” URIs be

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco and Lync/Skype with Media Bypass

Are you using the official Planning Tool that you download and install from Microsoft? One of the questions it asks about each site is what percentage of calls will use media bypass. When you get to the end it should take your media bypass use into consideration in its recommendations. -mn

Re: [cisco-voip] Jitter on Calls

If you have a way to packet capture the traffic at the gateway, Wireshark can show most of those stats in realtime. Look under Telephony --> RTP --> Show All Streams. That screen won't show the called/calling party phone numbers though; if you need that info then it requires some minor

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP session timer in IOS gateway

nrealistic version requirement somewhere unpleasant. Have I mentioned how much fun this journey into SIP interop is? -mn From: bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade Sent: October-03-16 3:51 PM To: Norton, Mike <mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca> Cc: cisco-voip@puc

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP session timer in IOS gateway

Cisco TAC to acknowledge that this is a bug? ;-) -mn From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Norton, Mike Sent: September-23-16 3:19 PM To: Brian Meade <bmead...@vt.edu> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SIP session timer in IOS g

Re: [cisco-voip] SIP session timer in IOS gateway

IOS to wait until closer to 1800. -mn From: Daniel Pagan [mailto:dpa...@fidelus.com] Sent: September-23-16 2:23 PM To: Daniel Pagan <dpa...@fidelus.com>; Norton, Mike <mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca>; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: SIP session timer in IOS gateway I should be mor

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO Disconnect Detection

I don't know much about U.S. standards but I'd be surprised if it was required. It would probably just depend on your contract with them. I.e., if they have a written technical specification of the service you are buying, then obviously they need to meet that specification. In Canada, those

[cisco-voip] Manipulate calling name on IOS gateway

What are my options for manipulating calling name in an IOS gateway (SIP to ISDN-PRI)? In CUCM, line appearances have "UTF name" and "ASCII name." This allowed me to put specific people's names for internal VoIP calls (UTF) and a more generic organization name for PSTN calls (ASCII). But now

Re: [cisco-voip] Block call based on ANI and DNIS at the same time

ion as well as ANI at the same time. We are using CUCM 9.x with an MGCP gateway. We have also asked the vendor not to call extn 1000 but it is taking them a while to remove that number from their autodialers I guess as calls are still arriving. Thanks for any ideas Mike S. _

Re: [cisco-voip] Supervisory Disconnect on ATA 190

If the paging controller is taking the ATA off-hook as soon as you plug it in, then it sounds to me like the interface on the paging controller is the wrong kind of interface (perhaps needs to be configured). Disconnect supervision issues would show up *after* making an announcement, but you

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

t: July-11-16 1:27 PM To: Damisch, Kevin <kevin.dami...@oneneck.com>; Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com>; Norton, Mike <mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller Another update I went thr

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

s hanging up because it is sensing that the answer supervision signal (reversed voltage) went away (that's the "normal_battery" part). "no battery-reversal" will disable answer supervision. -mn From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nort

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

Re-reading the thread, I noticed something... "no supervisory disconnect signal" actually *enables* tone-based disconnect supervision for *any tone*. Definitely not what you want!!! The "no" part of that command is that you are disabling power-denial disconnect signaling. In other words, it is

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

Hi Ryan, I'm happy to continue discussing this topic but it might be a bit generous to call me a "master" at it. I welcome corrections from anyone if I say something incorrect. :-) > As I understand supervisory disconnect (as it applies to this context), for > the local-end to be hanging up,

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

-30-16 4:10 PM To: Norton, Mike <mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net; Damisch, Kevin <kevin.dami...@oneneck.com> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller In this scenario Mike, do you think adjusting the impedance would be a benefi

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

f you use "connection plar opx" instead (with H.323/SIP; there is no equivalent for MGCP) then the FXO port won't answer the line until the IP phone is picked up, which is closer behaviour to what the Viking might be expecting. -mn From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.net

Re: [cisco-voip] FXO port to Viking C-1000B door entry controller

I'm not Wes but I'll take a go at it... An FXO port is the essentially the same thing as a regular old analog POTS phone. The side of the connection that's across from an FXO port is essentially the same thing as a phone company. A phone company cannot magically reach into your house and put

Re: [cisco-voip] Max length for analogue

If they are currently doing 24 km then there probably are (or ought to be) inductive loading coils every so often in order to counteract the capacitance of the cable. Otherwise the sound quality would be lousy (high-frequency loss) no matter what equipment is on the end. I'm guessing that the

Re: [cisco-voip] Max length for analogue

Having managed an old Nortel Meridian 81, the long distance analog card is the OPS card (Off Premise Station card). It was rated for 10km. That being said, it's like Brian stated, depends on the properties of the copper cable. The other fact you need to know, if you have a balanced and loaded

Re: [cisco-voip] Helios IP Uni intercom units Dual Button.

Matthew - "The phones are registered and they can place calls between each other." Are they actually meant to be used that way? Sounds to me like the speakerphone logic is getting confused and/or sucks. E.g. the speakerphone logic on one side makes adjustments, it confuses the speakerphone

Re: [cisco-voip] [cisco-VoIP] UCCE agents on wireless IP Communicator?

The thing people always seem to forget about Wi-Fi deployments is this: “This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received,

Re: [cisco-voip] How Important is Running "Supported?"

When deciding whether to venture into unsupported territory, I think it is worth distinguishing between different types of “unsupported.” One type of “unsupported” is when a vendor says certain pieces must be certain things and at certain versions, but you choose to go against their

Re: [cisco-voip] Digicert Wildcard cert

I use Digicert wildcard certs a lot for totally unrelated uses. Just did one yesterday. I have never seen them want to generate the private key for me. That would be silly. If anyone other than me had the private key, then it wouldn’t be very private, would it? Maybe there is a way to have them

Re: [cisco-voip] cisco.com/go/tools

Yeah, bug search. I found it with Google easy enough. -mn From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: April-06-16 12:51 PM To: Norton, Mike <mikenor...@pwsd76.ab.ca> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] cisco.com/go/tools Is there a tool link you were l

[cisco-voip] cisco.com/go/tools

Apologies for being slightly off-topic, but I know there are some folks here with connections to this URI. Anyone else have trouble accessing the http://www.cisco.com/go/tools page? It seems to require "entitlement" that my account doesn't have. Wondering if it's my account or if it's broken.

Re: [cisco-voip] No inbound call signaling

I wouldn’t be so quick to rule out cabling. Ring voltage is WAY higher than anything else that goes through that cable, so ringing can often highlight cabling problems that other signals appear to be fine with. It is common to have a “partial” short (e.g. nicked wire insulation, or moisture)

Re: [cisco-voip] 8.6 SW_Feature License

You didn't say what product you're talking about, so I'm going assume you're talking about CUCM. My CUCM 8.6 cluster only has one, for the publisher's MAC address. So I think you only need one. Interestingly my license file is actually for "8.0" not for 8.6. Hmm. Licensing for 8.6 is the

Re: [cisco-voip] hand held camera video conferencing recording solution with CUCM - SX80 w/ mediasense? or VCS?

To me, “hand held camera” typically brings to mind something that would already be capable of recording video on its own. If recording to SD card in the cameras could work for you, then I think that would give you the highest quality and greatest post-production flexibility. -mn From:

Re: [cisco-voip] hand held camera video conferencing recording solution with CUCM - SX80 w/ mediasense? or VCS?

there even is post-production. If there is not, then yeah you’ll need a solution that captures the live switching. -mn From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:le...@uoguelph.ca] Sent: February-11-16 3:37 PM To: Norton, Mike Cc: voip puck Subject: Re: hand held camera video conferencing recording solution

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Native Presence (BLF/SD) populating Directories / Call Lists

The reason 3001 does not show a missed call is because 3001 did not miss any calls. The call was for 3002. A blinky light flashing is NOT a call. It's just a blinky light to tell you that someone else has a call. Enabling the "BLF for call lists" parameter means you can view people's presence

Re: [cisco-voip] Inbound dial-peer matching

...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade Sent: December-02-15 2:39 PM To: Norton, Mike Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Inbound dial-peer matching Mike, For an FXS port, I believe the inbound dial-peer matching works a bit differently. dial-peer 203 is listed first

[cisco-voip] Inbound dial-peer matching

3 ! dial-peer voice 6 pots description INCOMING FXS3 incoming called-number . port 0/2/3 ! -- Mike Norton I.T. Specialist Peace Wapiti School Division No. 76 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] solution for multiple sip carriers?

Have you asked either carrier if they can remove the outbound caller ID restriction? With my carrier (PRI, not SIP, but same issue) it was basically just a matter of asking them. -mn From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Barnett, Nick Sent: November-06-15

[cisco-voip] CUCM Jakarta Dial-plan

Does someone have a CUCM base Dial-Plan for Jakarta? Looking for best practice or consolidated routes before I start working from the online/published area codes for Indonesia. Thanks! Mike ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https

Re: [cisco-voip] Caller ID

Caller ID will normally survive call-forwarding, unless you are rewriting it somewhere. In which case, the solution is to not do that, as Matthew explained. There's a good chance you are already sending the correct caller ID (check out the debug isdn q931 on your gateway to confirm). But since

Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?

Filezilla is the FTP/ SFTP server I've been rolling with for awhile. Mike On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.v...@gmail.com> wrote: > What are others using for there UC backup server Application for SFTP and > FTP? > > I've started a pilot with FreeFTPd but

Re: [cisco-voip] Windows SFTP / FTP server recommendations?

t 29, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) < > jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote: > >> Love to know how you setup SFTP in Filezilla Server…. >> >> >> >> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On >> Behalf Of *Mike King

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 10.5.2 Split Brain Recovery

Even though it is true that newer Windows versions have moved to NTP from SNTP, Microsoft still does not intend for you to use it as an “NTP server” per se. It is intended for AD’s own internal time-syncing needs and that’s it. -- Support boundary to configure the Windows Time service for

[cisco-voip] Multiple Version of CUCM integrated with CER

. We see only one CUCM Version selection option in CER. Does CER support Multiple CUCM versions simultaneously? Thanks! Mike Lydick ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM with Lync RCC

George, Microsoft has recently rebranded Lync to Skype for Business: https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Lync-is-now-Skype-for-Business-%E2%80%94-see-what-s-new-aba02d7e-c801-4a82-bccd-e7207240f612 They have the following help guide:

[cisco-voip] OT: RTC on 2960X

-x_cg_chapter_010.html#concept_271AA2D10D3340F0A45A3013DD5DB4DB I'm just a little surprised that the 2960X has a RTC. Has anyone else run across the lower end switches having RTC's? (Like the 3850's?) Mike ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

[cisco-voip] CUCM 10.5 and MS AD LDS

feedback on how you got it working. Thanks! Mike ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] CUC 10.5.2 Publisher Rebuild

better/worse than doing a cobras restore or DRS. Any caveats? Mike, ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Connection PLAR problem...

Are you certain it’s DTMF that you’re hearing, not caller ID? If you pick up too soon (before 2 rings) it could be possible you’re hearing caller ID. Other than that, with analog phones, weirdness with onhook/offhook/ringing state is often a cabling issue, e.g. partial short, poor connection,

Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

I don’t know anything about MRA, but firewalling DNS responses does sound icky. If your DNS servers happen to be BIND then this sounds suspiciously like a job for BIND’s “views” feature, if you haven’t looked into that already. -mn From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net]

[cisco-voip] 4000 series ISR DSP

on the motherboard to support CUCM / CUBE functions, but I can't pull from the T1 cards to satisfy any xcode or conf resources is that correct? Thanks for the help Mike ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection

You will have to install the Informix OBDC drivers and enable Unity for Remote administration but it works if you do not want to mess with changing java versions. The greeting prompt editor is really nice, allows for editing the prompt. Mike, On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:08 PM Jason Aarons (AM

Re: [cisco-voip] Priority of Calls To Hunt Pilot

There is no such thing as once a station becomes available. Either there already is one available and the caller gets connected immediately, or there isn't one available and the caller gets busy tone. There is no way to wait for a station to become available. -mn -Original Message-

Re: [cisco-voip] Multi-Year SmartNet Purchasing Woes

If you create your quotes in CSCC then disti should just price that quote (it will have MY discount). If you create your quotes in CCW then disti will screw it up 99% of the time. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Anthony Holloway Sent: Thursday,

Re: [cisco-voip] CUC EST Time off...

I’m not seeing what the problem is. EST is supposed to be 5 hours behind UTC, so the offset looks correct to me. Perhaps you are confusing EST and EDT? http://yates2.com/blog/2011/11/pst-vs-pdt-do-you-know-the-difference/ -mn From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On

Re: [cisco-voip] Extension that hangs up on the user?

I'm showing my age here, but in the Nortel mailing list I used to be apart of, everyone was aware if you needed a phone to do something wacky, you needed to look at the sandman. This might work for you. http://www.sandman.com/Wizard.html#CPCGenerator On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:31 PM, James

Re: [cisco-voip] FXS voltages / POTS compatibility

I doubt you’d need all the features of the Viking LLA-1. I.e. support for pulse dialing, regenerating the 20 Hz ringing signal, etc. I’ve used the much cheaper Viking TBB-1B for connecting FXS ports to a picky intercom system. IIRC it was under $100. Worked fine, although it was not a Cisco

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX trigger ringing normal users

Rogue Translation pattern? On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Tanner Ezell tanner.ez...@gmail.com wrote: Check your call reports, the destination or called number would be their internal extension. You can find out which application is causing it and troubleshoot from there. On Tue, Feb 10,

[cisco-voip] Removing licenses CUCM 8.6

How can I remove all licenses from CUCM 8.6? At the command-line, I did file delete license * and deleted all the license files. Then I rebooted (twice even). The license files are all gone but the License Unit Report page still shows all the license counts from before and everything is fine. I

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE across VRFs

. -mn From: Erick [mailto:erick...@gmail.com] Sent: February-03-15 6:50 PM To: Norton, Mike Cc: Jason Aarons (AM); cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE across VRFs Only one voice vrf can be defined in IOS. Global under voice service voip. Cube-SP lets you do multiple vrf's

Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE across VRFs

looking to plop a CUBE between my network and a SIP provider’s network without having to participate in routing protocol on either side. -mn From: Jason Aarons (AM) [mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com] Sent: February-03-15 5:02 PM To: Norton, Mike; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: CUBE

[cisco-voip] CUBE across VRFs

something? My Googling is dredging up a lot of really old info that I'm not sure is still relevant. -- Mike Norton ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] cutting the cord... going wireless

devices are neither permitted to cause interference, nor can they claim protection from any that they may receive. It is for this reason that Industry Canada will not normally investigate reports of radio interference affecting licence-exempt radio devices.” -- Mike Norton I.T. Specialist Peace

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCE-Enterprise CVP script question

I was told (several releases ago, and haven't done this since) that you can record your greeting as a voicemail on Unity Connection, and it will be the correct WAV format, if you don't want to mess with a PC rig. Mike On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Ryan Burtch rburt...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [cisco-voip] FYI: UCCx v9.0 EOL announced...

Just a FYI…10.6 will be your CAD to Finesse migration platform. It is the only supported co-resident version available for CAD Finesse to be activated at the same time. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Anthony Holloway Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015

[cisco-voip] SIP Caller ID issue

field. Anyone ever ran into this? Thanks, Mike ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Software and headset for VoIP/POTS/Radio

Never used it, but remember this from about 5 years ago: http://web.cistera.com/c3/products/product_briefs/Product_Brief_LMRConnect.pdf I know that there are other companies, Cisco has Cisco IPICS http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/physical-security/interoperability-systems/index.html Mike

Re: [cisco-voip] Licenses upgrade issues

Dana, I’ve been down this road before. You need to do the following: 1) Have your Cisco account team open a PSTS case 2) Find out if the ESW contract changed and became unattached from UCSS 3) SO# this one is huge..sorry to say it’s your golden ticket for entitlements you

Re: [cisco-voip] Consolidate two separate UCCX cluster and migrate to 9.x

(Looking at you Leilo and your Saga) will expose upgrade issues in the lab, not in production. Mike On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Ashwani R ashw...@ranpise.com wrote: Team, I have a customer who has two separate UCCX HA cluster with their respective CUCM cluster (merging two companies

Re: [cisco-voip] Consolidate two separate UCCX cluster and migrate to 9.x

UCCX 10.6 supports CAD and Finesse as ️Co-resident and rumor has it that is the only version that will support this configuration so plan accordingly. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 18, 2014, at 3:17 PM, Josh Warcop j...@warcop.com wrote: First - your target version should be the 10.6 release

Re: [cisco-voip] Consolidate two separate UCCX cluster and migrate to 9.x

[mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 6:22 PM To: Josh Warcop Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Consolidate two separate UCCX cluster and migrate to 9.x UCCX 10.6 supports CAD and Finesse as ️Co-resident and rumor has

Re: [cisco-voip] Call track

Having lived thru one of these, (albeit 15 years ago), you should also look at your voicemail system. Does your voicemail system allow you forward calls externally, or from a menu? It's an avenue of investigation. On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Dharambir kumar varma dharambi...@gmail.com

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

I’ve never seen it take that long once you are on the new licensing platform. The biggest issues I’ve seen is from pre-9.x to 9.x or 10.x Josh must have magical powers because licensing is a nightmare. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Haas, Neal

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

Unicast me one of your case numbers I want to see how you are getting past all the BS. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Josh Warcop Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 2:28 PM To: Mike ; 'Haas, Neal'; 'Bill Talley' Cc: 'cisco-voip' Subject: Re: [cisco

  1   2   >