med
Abd EL-Rahman
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 5:57 PM
To: nizarshab...@live.com<mailto:nizarshab...@live.com>
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Cluster Redundancy
Hi Nizar,
This is what I’m asking about, the clie
arshab...@live.com
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Cluster Redundancy
Hi Nizar,
This is what I’m asking about, the client suggested this approach and
I was asking about the pros and cons for such approach.
Best Regards
Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Senior Network En
To: Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Cluster Redundancy
hi
You mean you wan t to have 2 pubs in one cluster ?!! ? What is the benefit of
this machine.?
regards
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
mailto:ahmed.rah
://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_VMWare_Requirements
Rob
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ahmed
Abd EL-Rahman
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 10:03 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM Cluster Redundancy
Hi All,
I
hi
You mean you wan t to have 2 pubs in one cluster ?!! ? What is the benefit
of this machine.?
regards
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman <
ahmed.rah...@bmbgroup.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a UC cluster V10.5 on 2 UCS Blade servers having 1 Pub
> and 4 Subs,
...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brian
Meade
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 10:16 AM
To: Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Cluster Redundancy
Ahmed,
I don't think this is a good route to go. Really you should have no dependence
on the publisher be
operations will
continue.
Hank
From: Brian Meade
Date: Friday, March 20, 2015 at 10:15
To: Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Cc: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>"
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Cluster Redundancy
Ahmed,
I don't think this is a good rou
Senior Network Engineer
From: bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 5:16 PM
To: Ahmed Abd EL-Rahman
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Cluster Redundancy
Ahmed,
I don't think this is a good route to go. R
Ahmed,
I don't think this is a good route to go. Really you should have no
dependence on the publisher besides configuration updates so it shouldn't
be anything that affects operation.
I would be concerned that the subscribers would have a more updated version
of the database than the cold-stand
Hi All,
I have a UC cluster V10.5 on 2 UCS Blade servers having 1 Pub and 4
Subs, and I'd like to ask if there is any need or benefit from having a cold
standby virtual machine for the Pub server (a replicated VM for the Pub which
is turned off to backup Pub functionality in case of Pu
10 matches
Mail list logo
