Lelio
Fulgenzi
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 8:35 AM
To: Cisco-voip (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] OT: using subnet/wildcard mask for group within a
group, issues?
Thanks Anthony!
I should have included that I would be looking at ACLs only, nothing like
modifying
I don't know if I follow all of it.
But if you have host with a /26 with a /29 inside of of that network. the
larger SN devices will try to go directly to the smaller SN but the Smaller
SN will not be able to get to the larger SN.
It would not be a design I would try in production.
YMMV.
S
)"
SENT: Thursday, February 5, 2015 11:29:24 AM
SUBJECT: Re: [cisco-voip] OT: using subnet/wildcard mask for group
within a group, issues?
I'm no Route/Switch engineer, so I'm likely wrong here, but I'll give
my two cents anyway.
You didn't specifically state what yo
quot;
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" , "Cisco-voip
(cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)"
Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 11:29:24 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] OT: using subnet/wildcard mask for group within a
group, issues?
I'm no Route/Switch engineer, so I'm likely wrong
I'm no Route/Switch engineer, so I'm likely wrong here, but I'll give my
two cents anyway.
You didn't specifically state what you are doing though. E.g., ACLs,
Interfaces, Routes, etc.
Let's pretend for a moment you wanted to carve out a new network in your
environment for this range.
I don't t
This group is full of it. Knowledge, that is. So who better to ask these
questions
I've got a subnet, say 192.168.45.0/26, of which I want to allow only a small
group of that subnet to access a particular host. I'm able to reserve the top
end, which falls into another subnet, 192.168.45.5
