Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 8 Auto Attendant exclusion

2015-02-05 Thread NateCCIE
Try changing his transfer extension in unity connection. > On Feb 5, 2015, at 11:46 AM, Brian Palmer wrote: > > I have a CEO that wants anybody using the directory lookup from unity > connection(last name, first name) to find him to be directed to his secretary > while also allowing anybody t

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 8 Auto Attendant exclusion

2015-02-05 Thread Brian Palmer
lloway [mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 2:48 PM To: Brian Palmer; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 8 Auto Attendant exclusion Within CUC there is only one way to specify a Transfer Rule for a subscriber, so I don't think y

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity Connection 8 Auto Attendant exclusion

2015-02-05 Thread Anthony Holloway
Within CUC there is only one way to specify a Transfer Rule for a subscriber, so I don't think you're going to get the differentiated services you want from within CUC so simply. There are many options to consider, sure, to include prefix routing, PT/CSS tricks, etc. And if you are considering al

[cisco-voip] Unity Connection 8 Auto Attendant exclusion

2015-02-05 Thread Brian Palmer
I have a CEO that wants anybody using the directory lookup from unity connection(last name, first name) to find him to be directed to his secretary while also allowing anybody that knows his direct extension to still be able to get him directly. This is for a UCCX 8 environment that also has CV