;https://dashradio.com/buildabear>
From: cisco-voip
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>>
On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 11:31 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] E911 Address Incorrect
He
ldabear>, YouTube
> <https://www.youtube.com/user/Buildabearworkshop1>, Pinterest
> <https://pinterest.com/buildabear/>
>
> <http://www.buildabear.com/> <https://dashradio.com/buildabear>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Lelio
> Fulgenzi
&g
lio
Fulgenzi
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 11:31 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] E911 Address Incorrect
Hey Jason,
Do you subscribe to a PS-ALI type service? Or are you relying on default
address information?
If you are relying on default address information - that
t;http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram,
Twitter and Facebook
[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
From: cisco-voip On Behalf Of Jason Faraone
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 12:09 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] E911 Address Incorrect
I
I have a location that shows the correct physical address when I dial 933, but
a slightly incorrect address when dialing 911. Has anyone encountered this
before?
Dialing 933 shows Oakbrook Center, where 911 shows Oakbrook Road. Everything
else is correct (State, CID, zip, street address). There
West/Redsky are the 2 big players in this space.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 2:49 PM Lisa Notarianni
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We are currently using SPOK as our E911 system in our Cisco VoIP
> environment. We populate the data nightly through a provisioning tool
> called 2nd Nature. SPOK also provid
Hello All,
We are currently using SPOK as our E911 system in our Cisco VoIP environment.
We populate the data nightly through a provisioning tool called 2nd Nature.
SPOK also provides a desktop client to notify our police department of a 911
call plus a passive phone call for them to listen t
inkedin.com/company/donoma-software>
From: cisco-voip on behalf of Matthew
Loraditch
Date: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 4:07 PM
To: NateCCIE , 'Ryan Huff' ,
"cisco-voip@puck.nether.net"
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] e911
As far as I know that feature doesn’t notify anyone int
f they keep dialing
>>> which usually what happens on a miss-dial, they get whatever your 911!
>>> Pattern is configured to do, usually I like block this pattern.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Nate
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
It would be the PSTN carrier the Spark customer is using, that would ultimately
provide the PSAP routing.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/unified-communications/hosted-collaboration-solution-hcs/datasheet-c78-736823.html
My thought is, what if anything, will this change for Sp
Oh I see. Yeah, government ignorance aside, I would say it is.
So, Spark does support 911 calls today?
If so, what's there to change? The law seems to be written such that, as
long as the system is configured for direct 911 access, before being
"installed," you're fine. The "installed" word m
If this is to apply to multi line telephone systems at large, is the Spark
Cloud not a MLTS?
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 7, 2018, at 22:12, Anthony Holloway
mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Can you not call 911 from Spark? Or did I miss what "this" is in your context?
On Wed, M
Matthew Loraditch
mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com>>
Cc: NateCCIE mailto:natec...@gmail.com>>; Ryan Huff
mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com>>;
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] e911
Seems like there's two key aspects we need
Can you not call 911 from Spark? Or did I miss what "this" is in your
context?
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:11 PM Ryan Huff wrote:
> I wonder how cloud-based phone system like Cisco spark will answer this?
>
>
> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/karis-law-you-compliant-edgar-salazar
>
> Sent from my i
om:* Bill Talley
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 7, 2018 2:22 PM
> *To:* Matthew Loraditch
> *Cc:* NateCCIE ; Ryan Huff ;
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] e911
>
>
>
> Seems like there's two key aspects we need to be concerned with. 1) As
the taking of any action in reliance
on the contents of this Email information is strictly prohibited.
From: cisco-voip on behalf of Matthew
Loraditch
Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 4:37 PM
To: Bill Talley; Ryan Huff
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [
: [cisco-voip] e911
Seems like there's two key aspects we need to be concerned with. 1) As I think
Matthew is pointing out, notifications are only required if notifications are a
native feature available "without improvement", i.e. add-on components. 2) We
now MUST confi
: www.heliontechnologies.com | e: mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bill
Talley
Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 4:32 PM
To: Ryan Huff
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] e911
Digging further, does this mean the
Digging further, does this mean the law doesn't go into affect until Feb,
2020?
(b) Effective Date.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply with
respect to a multi-line telephone system that is manufactured, imported,
offered for first sale or lease, first sold or leased, or installed aft
: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 4:22 PM
To: Matthew Loraditch
Cc: NateCCIE ; Ryan Huff ;
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] e911
Seems like there's two key aspects we need to be concerned with. 1) As I think
Matthew is pointing out, notifications are only required if notifica
[mailto:natec...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 7, 2018 3:58 PM
> *To:* Matthew Loraditch ; 'Ryan Huff' <
> ryanh...@outlook.com>; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* RE: [cisco-voip] e911
>
>
>
> Um, I thought it did.
>
>
>
> https://www.
ed-
> communications-manager-callmanager/200452-Usage-of-
> Native-Emergency-Call-Routing-F.html
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Matthew
> Loraditch
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 7, 2018 1:36 PM
> *To:* Ryan Huff ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subje
nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] e911
Um, I thought it did.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-callmanager/200452-Usage-of-Native-Emergency-Call-Routing-F.html
From: cisco-voip
mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>>
On B
; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] e911
To piggy back on this, while Cisco doesn’t have emergency notifications built
in, as the law mentions, and thus they are not required, does anyone know of
options beyond Singlewire that they are happy with? The installs would monitor
image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/heliontech>
> [image: LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Ryan Huff
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 7, 2018 3:11 PM
> *To:*
-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] e911
I wonder how cloud-based phone system like Cisco spark will answer this?
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/karis-law-you-compliant-edgar-salazar
Sent from my iPhone
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip
I wonder how cloud-based phone system like Cisco spark will answer this?
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/karis-law-you-compliant-edgar-salazar
Sent from my iPhone
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/lis
Date: *Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 4:53 PM
> *To: *Brian Meade
> *Cc: *voip puck
> *Subject: *Re: [cisco-voip] e911, CER, wireless and soft phones?
>
>
>
> Can any of these solutions do anything better than tell me what AP I'm on?
>
>
>
> And that incl
Yep, we are wireless on /16, makes roaming a heck of a lot easier, but is
worthless for subnet e911 tracking. We also have RedSky's cloud service.
I've reached out to them to try and get a demo of their warez.
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Brian Meade wrote:
> Yea, but most people are deploy
Cc: voip puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] e911, CER, wireless and soft phones?
Can any of these solutions do anything better than tell me what AP I'm on?
And that includes telling me my location based on the location of the AP.
I'd hope that there'd be some type of triangu
Cc: Cisco VoIP Group
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] e911, CER, wireless and soft phones?
A 911 solution just by itself would not do this. You need something like the
Cisco MSE along with Cisco Prime and a 911 solution like 911 Enable by West
Christopher
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:53 PM Lelio
A 911 solution just by itself would not do this. You need something like
the Cisco MSE along with Cisco Prime and a 911 solution like 911 Enable by
West
Christopher
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:53 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> Can any of these solutions do anything better than tell me what AP I'm on
Can any of these solutions do anything better than tell me what AP I'm on?
And that includes telling me my location based on the location of the AP.
I'd hope that there'd be some type of triangulation based on proximity to
several APs. Or some sort of partnership with the BU that handles rfid/be
Yea, but most people are deploying their entire campus wireless as a single
/16 for better roaming.
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Ben Amick wrote:
> Doesn't CER have the ability to track by subnet?
>
> Ben Amick
> Telecom Analyst
>
> > On May 31, 2017, at 3:59 PM, Nick Barnett
> wrote:
> >
>
Doesn't CER have the ability to track by subnet?
Ben Amick
Telecom Analyst
> On May 31, 2017, at 3:59 PM, Nick Barnett wrote:
>
> I'm looking into options to properly track softphones with CER. Our CER is
> 100% Intrado right now, but we're looking at ditching hard phones and need to
> figur
Redsky is the big player in this field.
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Nick Barnett
wrote:
> I'm looking into options to properly track softphones with CER. Our CER is
> 100% Intrado right now, but we're looking at ditching hard phones and need
> to figure out tracking of softphones, especiall
I'm looking into options to properly track softphones with CER. Our CER is
100% Intrado right now, but we're looking at ditching hard phones and need
to figure out tracking of softphones, especially when connected wirelessly.
What are people using out there?
Thanks,
Nick
_
37 matches
Mail list logo
