Hi there,
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 David F. Skoll wrote:
I noticed the announcement of the bytecode interpreter in the 0.96-rc1
announcement.
...
Why do we need the bytecode interpreter? Can we disable it if we decide
the cons outweigh the pros?
I was about to write something along these lines
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:29 AM, G.W. Haywood
clamav-de...@jubileegroup.co.uk wrote:
Hi there,
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 David F. Skoll wrote:
I noticed the announcement of the bytecode interpreter in the 0.96-rc1
announcement.
...
Why do we need the bytecode interpreter? Can we disable it if
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:29:16 + (GMT)
G.W. Haywood clamav-de...@jubileegroup.co.uk wrote:
Hi there,
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 David F. Skoll wrote:
I noticed the announcement of the bytecode interpreter in the 0.96-rc1
announcement.
...
Why do we need the bytecode interpreter? Can we
On 2010-03-11 15:44, Renato Botelho wrote:
IIRC, you can use --enable-llvm=no at ./configure to disable.
That just disables the JIT, not the interpreter.
On 2010-03-11 16:26, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:29:16 + (GMT)
G.W. Haywood clamav-de...@jubileegroup.co.uk wrote:
Török Edwin wrote:
Right now the only detections one can write are pattern-based. You
can't write heuristic detections, you can't write unpackers, you
can't support new file formats, and you can't do more complex
analysis than pattern matching. The bytecode tries to offer the
possibility
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Due to security reasons all bytecodes need to be digitally signed,
so no 3rd parties will be able to inject any code into your installations.
I believe this is the same security model used by Microsoft for Active X.
(NOTE: I am in no way implying that your bytecode
A FreeBSD user contacted me reporting a problem building clamav
under FreeBSD 9. I reproduced it locally, using 20100308 snapshot:
[--] 3 tests from JITEventListenerTest
[ RUN ] JITEventListenerTest.Simple
[ OK ] JITEventListenerTest.Simple
[ RUN ]
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Renato Botelho rbga...@gmail.com wrote:
A FreeBSD user contacted me reporting a problem building clamav
under FreeBSD 9. I reproduced it locally, using 20100308 snapshot:
[--] 3 tests from JITEventListenerTest
[ RUN ] JITEventListenerTest.Simple
On 03/11/2010 09:57 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Renato Botelho rbga...@gmail.com wrote:
A FreeBSD user contacted me reporting a problem building clamav
under FreeBSD 9. I reproduced it locally, using 20100308 snapshot:
[--] 3 tests from
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:26:07 -0500
David F. Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Due to security reasons all bytecodes need to be digitally signed,
so no 3rd parties will be able to inject any code into your installations.
I believe this is the same security model
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Renato Botelho rbga...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/3/11 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
On 03/11/2010 10:06 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
2010/3/11 Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com:
On 03/11/2010 09:57 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Renato
On 03/11/2010 10:31 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
I needed to stop and start again, now I got this:
FAIL: LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/bswap-inline-asm.ll (1340 of 2135)
TEST 'LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/bswap-inline-asm.ll'
FAILED
Script:
--
llc
12 matches
Mail list logo
