On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 20:11, Henri van Riel wrote:
Hello Trog,
Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 8:47:26 PM, you wrote:
On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 19:39, Henri van Riel wrote:
I'm just wondering why there are two processes...
They aren't processes, they are threads. Clamd spawns new threads to
I run both spamass-milter and clamav-milter with no problems. Why not post
the configuration files here and we'll look at them.
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.uk
Quoting Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Exploit.IFRAME.foo:*:494652414d453d??{256-}
Bad format.
Does this one seem okay?
note1: ndb database format: use with v0.80
note2: matches iframe src=file:// ..{586}.. name=
On Monday 01 Nov 2004 14:18, Tom D`Asto wrote:
Trying to complete the installation of clamav. I want to configure the
clamav-milter (./configure --enable-milter) for email scanning. However,
during the configure, libmilter directory cannot be located. I can't find
it either...
What operating
Is 0.80n any better?
-Nigel
On Monday 01 Nov 2004 22:57, Internet Helpdesk wrote:
Sorry to repeat my question but...
I've tried to update my clamav-milter... Any version after 0.80j gives a
segfault immediately when I try to run it.
What information can I provide to help diagnose this
note1: ndb database format: use with v0.80
note2: matches iframe src=file:// ..{586}.. name=
exploit.iframe.file:3:*:3C696672616D65207372633D66696C653A2F2F{-586}6E616D653D22
It's close to what we want. How do we account for tags like this where
the atrtibutes aren't in order? A regex is
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 01:45:36 -0800 (PST) in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In reality, we should never see a src 586 bytes long. It's just
sane html to say keep it restricted.
But do the writers of malware only produce sane html? I suspect not.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at
On Wednesday 03 Nov 2004 03:22, Tom D`Asto wrote:
I'm following the instructions in clamav-0.80/clamav-milter/INSTALL.
My first problem is that the following file does not exist so I can't
add the variable CLAMAV_FLAGS:
Add to /etc/sysconfig/clamav-milter
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Brian Morrison wrote:
In reality, we should never see a src 586 bytes long. It's just
sane html to say keep it restricted.
But do the writers of malware only produce sane html? I suspect not.
That's exactly what I mean. Any iframe with a src={256,} in an email
Do you know if it is possible to obtain the same behavior of the WebShield?
I'm using (postfix,amavisd-new,clamav)
Federico
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Joe Maimon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: martedì 2 novembre 2004 21.18
A: ClamAV users ML
Oggetto: Re: [Clamav-users]
zlib 1.2.2 is available at:
http://www.zlib.net/
this version fixes the known zlib stability issue that Clam can hit in
previous 1.2.x versions.
If your vendor hasn't released an update yet, you may want to do a
manual update.
References:
- Original Message -
From: Nigel Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 3:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter segfault
Is 0.80n any better?
from 10/30/2004? Nope, sorry.
-Troy
-Nigel
Hi there
I think the TCP option needs some more explicit documentation, as I have
begun seeing RPMs of clamav where the Socket option is *disabled* and the
TCP option is *enabled* as the defaults.
As far as I'm aware, that is *not* a good idea. Not only are there now
network security issues you
Is 0.80n any better?
from 10/30/2004? Nope, sorry.
Dang. I'm going to have to eat my words. I went to run it (clamav-milter
.80n) under gdb and discovered it's not segfaulting anymore, it's running
fine.
I could swear on a stack of bibles that I was trying to use the very lastest
Hello all, please bear with me since i am very new
to this list.
I have a RedHat 8.0 mail server that is running
clamav-0.75
and need some help to upgrade to clamav
.80
The first thing that i ran into was some failed
dependacies
see the output below
warning: clamav-0.80-1.i386.rpm: V3
On 11/03/2004 04:25 PM, tester wrote:
Hello all, please bear with me since i am very new to this list.
snip
So now i am thinking that maybe i need to uninstall .75 and then try
installing .80 but i do not know how to uninstall .75
rpm -e clamav
If someone on the list feels that this is the
tester [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]# rpm -ivh clamav-0.80-2.i386.rpm
Use rpm -Uvh clamav-0.80-2.i386.rpm instead.
-i means Install a new package; choke if a package by that name exists
-U means Update an existing package, or install if there is no existing
package
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now i am getting conflict errors.
So now i am thinking that maybe i need to uninstall .75 and then try
installing .80 but i do not know how to uninstall .75
Heh, RPM dependancies can be fun :) Remove the old package. Been a
while (rpm -e clamav )IIRC
I always compile from source even when
tester wrote:
Hello all, please bear with me since i am very new to this list.
I have a RedHat 8.0 mail server that is running clamav-0.75
and need some help to upgrade to clamav .80
The first thing that i ran into was some failed dependacies
see the output below
warning:
Patrick Boutilier wrote:
On 11/03/2004 04:25 PM, tester wrote:
So now i am thinking that maybe i need to uninstall .75 and then try
installing .80 but i do not know how to uninstall .75
rpm -e clamav
Or rather,
rpm -e clamav clamav-db clamd
DAG divides clamav into 4 packages (clamav,
but it would appear
things for me have got worse.
Clamav-milter -V gives
ClamAV version devel-20041103, clamav-milter version 0.80o
I am recompiling now with
./configure --enable-milter --enable-debug as specified in the clamav-milter
man page.
May be related to the above problem.
Evan
Thanks, the rpm -e clamav clamav-db clamd was what i really needed.
Thanks
gary
- Original Message -
From: Kelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Updating to clamav 8 from 7.5 on Redhat8
Well i have to say that it has been one hell of a ride so far.
If i did'nt have to keep running off to deal with other network issues then
i could devote a little more brain power to this one.
Thanks
Gary
- Original Message -
From: Troy Ayers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML
After successfully removing the old version, your command did the trick.
Thanks
Gary
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Malek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Updating to clamav 8 from 7.5 on Redhat8
Jim,
90% of all the progress that i have made has been a direct result of your
help and i do appreciate it.
I jumped over to this list just to see if i could come up with more info and
sources at the same time and i did.
Well now the old one is gone after removing all the componets of clamav.
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 15:36:28 -0600 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update
immediately ! WARNING: Current functionality level = 2, required = 3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
I typed in freshclam just to check it out
Brian Morrison wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 15:36:28 -0600 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED - please update
immediately ! WARNING: Current functionality level = 2, required = 3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
I typed in freshclam just to
Vis-a-vis [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s note of 11/03/2004 12:29 PM:
On 11/03/2004 04:25 PM, tester wrote:
Hello all, please bear with me since i am very new to this list.
snip
So now i am thinking that maybe i need to uninstall .75 and then try
installing .80 but i do not know how to uninstall .75
Hi All
I think I am in the right forum for this. so please excuse me if I am not
I am having trouble installing clamav on a linux box (remotely hosted)
I am getting an error when I do a shell install
the error is cpp has failed sanity checks
Now please excuse my lack of knowledge about gcc,
Chris wrote:
I am having trouble installing clamav on a linux box (remotely hosted)
And why would you want to do that (I assume you don't have root access)?
but I have checked, and the configure.log file says that cpp cant find
stdio.h and a few others.
these include files are in /usr/include
Thanks a bunch Fajar
It turns out it was because I wasnt logged in as root
I su'd to root and all worked thanks to your tip
being from windows all this security stuff is foreign to me ;)
Regards
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Fajar A. Nugraha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4
31 matches
Mail list logo
