I am trying to setup clamav-milter to only notify the postmaster when
a virus is detected. I'm using the below:
/usr/local/sbin/clamav-milter --max-children=20 -olb
local:/var/run/clamav/clamav-milter.sock --postmaster-only
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The postmaster does get notified, but the sender also r
> I am trying to setup clamav-milter to only notify the postmaster when
> a virus is detected. I'm using the below:
>
> /usr/local/sbin/clamav-milter --max-children=20 -olb
> local:/var/run/clamav/clamav-milter.sock --postmaster-only
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The postmaster does get notified, but the
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 18:25, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
> On Wed, April 5, 2006 1:08 pm, Rob MacGregor said:
> > WTF are you doing accepting email's at 200 MB? There are far more
> > appropriate methods of file transfer than SMTP!
>
> But they all require more complicated and lasting setups than
Hi -
I've just started to use ClamAV as part of an evaluation of several anti-virus
products for our UNIX/Linux networks. Our primary need is to scan filesystems.
The first thing I noticed was that there was no option to preserve file access
times, this is a problem for me, since we have archi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Miner, Jonathan W (CSC) (US SSA) wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I've just started to use ClamAV as part of an evaluation of several
> anti-virus products for our UNIX/Linux networks. Our primary need
> is to scan filesystems. The first thing I noticed was that th
>Miner, Jonathan W (CSC) (US SSA) wrote:
>> Hi -
>>
>> I've just started to use ClamAV as part of an evaluation of several
>> anti-virus products for our UNIX/Linux networks. Our primary need
>> is to scan filesystems. The first thing I noticed was that there
>> was no option to preserve file ac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Miner, Jonathan W (CSC) (US SSA) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Clamscan shouldn't be modifying the (modification time)... The
>> access time should be OK being modified; otherwise you would
>> backup/etc every time someone viewed a file.
>
> Clamscan does no
> No confusion. I just read your statement and looked at the code and
> your code resets both the modified time and the accessed time for the
> file.
The utime() system call sets both access and modification times at the same
time. If you were to only set one value, the other would be undefi
On Thursday 06 April 2006 19:17, Karolis Dautartas wrote:
> > Agreed, especially since ClamAV is a general virus-scanning tool and
> > not specifically for email.
>
> while sending emails of that size and scanning them for viruses is
> definately not the best idea, being unable to scan large files
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 10:39:07 -0400, Miner, Jonathan W (CSC) wrote:
> The utime() system call sets both access and modification times at the =
> same time. If you were to only set one value, the other would be =
> undefined, possibly ZERO! You need to use lstat() to read both values, =
> prior to
> Virgo Pärna says:
>
> What about ctime - this would cause change in ctime value.
I'll take your word for it; I have not tested that.
> I'm using AIDE (Advanced Intrusion Detection System) to monitor
> my systems and among the things that AIDE saves to it's database
> is file's ctime - if it
> I've just started to use ClamAV as part of an evaluation of several =
> anti-virus products for our UNIX/Linux networks. Our primary need is to =
> scan filesystems. The first thing I noticed was that there was no option =
> to preserve file access times, this is a problem for me, since we have
> Jeffrey T. Eaton says:
>
> This patch opens a possible race condition where a legitimate change
> to the file won't result in the modification time being updated.
Good catch... Thanks!
Sounds like you would need to do a second lstat() call, and them compare the
mtimes. If the mtimes are equal
13 matches
Mail list logo
