Hello Nepenthes,
Friday, May 12, 2006, 4:34:58 PM, you wrote:
> We still *have* that good intention, and these stats were written as
> some advertising for nepenthes, not as a 100% reliable source for
> comparisions between different scanners.
You and I are aware of this - but as you can see @
Hi,
On 5/12/06, Christoph Cordes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe it is of interest:
> http://nepenthes.mwcollect.org/stats:scannertest
Not really. You have to take the results with a grain of salt for several
reasons:
The test is 6 months old (even if heise.de still sells it as "News")
W
Hello Didi,
Friday, May 12, 2006, 3:44:19 PM, you wrote:
> Maybe it is of interest:
> http://nepenthes.mwcollect.org/stats:scannertest
Not really. You have to take the results with a grain of salt for several
reasons:
The test is 6 months old (even if heise.de still sells it as "News")
Man
Maybe it is of interest:
http://nepenthes.mwcollect.org/stats:scannertest
Didi
--
-
Didi Rieder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGPKey ID: 3431D0B0
-
--
-
Didi Rieder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGPKey ID: 3431D0B0
-
pgp
Hi Everyone,
clamav 88.2 doesnt recognize WMF Exploits anymore. Is there a good
reason for ?
thanks for your help
kind regards
# bdc wmf*
BDC/Linux-Console v7.1 (build 2559) (i386) (Jul 6 2005 16:28:53)
Copyright (C) 1996-2004 SOFTWIN SRL. All rights reserved.
/root/wmfexp2.jpg infected: Exp