-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
javierohc wrote:
> We are running into a strange error with clamd. On our logs we see the
> following:
>
>
> @4000456b14c61e546d5c simscan: calling clamdscan
> @4000456b14c61e547914 simscan: fatal error executing clamdscan
> @4000456b1
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 09:22:08AM +0900, H.Yagi said:
> Dear Sir ,
>
> I tried to do ClamAV 0.90 Compilation on BSDI 3.1.
> But I could not do "make".
> It indicated error messages.
> I used gcc version 2.7.2.1.
> pather# make
> make all-recursive
> Making all in libclamav
> source='matcher-ac.c
Dear Sir ,
I tried to do ClamAV 0.90 Compilation on BSDI 3.1.
But I could not do "make".
It indicated error messages.
I used gcc version 2.7.2.1.
pather# make
make all-recursive
Making all in libclamav
source='matcher-ac.c' object='matcher-ac.lo' libtool=yes DEPDIR=.deps
depmode=g
cc /usr/contri
> What I am actually trying to do is have clamscan only scan files that
> are new or have not changed since the last scan. I have gotten as far
> as creating a filelist containing a list of files that are new or where
> the md5sum has changed. The problem I have now is how to get that
> infor
I have a list of files that I have written to a file and I would like
clamscan to read the list from that file and scan only the files in the
list. Is there a good way to do this?
I have tried
cat filelist | xargs clamscan
This works, except that xarg can only pass about 200 filenames to
cl
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Jonathan Armitage wrote:
> I have just tried to configure, make and install Clamav-0.9RC2 on a Dell PC
> running Solaris 10. I have previously done the same with various 0.8 versions
I don't know if this is your issue, but if you have bash installed, try
editing the first li
>
> I do understand that pre acceptance processing raises the performance
> bar. I believe I can budget the resources required, and I am willing to
> revert if needed.
>
> Does anyone have clamav implemented as a policy service in postfix?
The only way I know to get what you want is with the Cla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan Armitage wrote:
> Apologies if this is the wrong list. Although I'm a long-time Clamav
> user, I haven't needed any support for years.
Right list.
> I have just tried to configure, make and install Clamav-0.9RC2 on a Dell
> PC running Solar
Apologies if this is the wrong list. Although I'm a long-time Clamav
user, I haven't needed any support for years.
I have just tried to configure, make and install Clamav-0.9RC2 on a Dell
PC running Solaris 10. I have previously done the same with various 0.8
versions and 0.9RC1 without any pr
* Christopher Cleveland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> My quick review of the archive/google did not turn up any implementation
> notes for using clamav as a policy rather than content filter.
A policy server never gets to see the CONTENT of a mail, but merely
meta information (sender, recipient, client
Erez Epstein wrote:
First of all I'd like to mirror the sentiment that ClamAV obviously
isn't designed as a "general purpose" scanner. If that's your primary
usage it may be advisable to find something more in line with your
goals. That said, ClamAV does a smashing job when it's in its element.
I
At 01:55 PM 11/27/2006, Christopher Cleveland wrote:
My quick review of the archive/google did not turn up any
implementation
notes for using clamav as a policy rather than content
filter. I already
have amavisd-new/clamd working, but would like to move the
virus scan
from post acceptance to pr
My quick review of the archive/google did not turn up any implementation
notes for using clamav as a policy rather than content filter. I already
have amavisd-new/clamd working, but would like to move the virus scan
from post acceptance to pre acceptance. By making this chance, the
sender's MTA wil
First make sure that the binary is still in the place
that simscan is looking for it. Second make sure
that simscan is in the clamav group (assuming you
aren't running as root.)
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
We are running into a strange error with clamd.
On our logs we see the fol
Hey,
We are running into a strange error with clamd.
On our logs we see the following:
@4000456b14c61e546d5c simscan: calling clamdscan
@4000456b14c61e547914 simscan: fatal error executing clamdscan
@4000456b14c61e5484cc simscan: exit error code: 71
We've google'd this
Hi,
I've had several variants of the Stration worm creep through recently. Some
of these are UPX encoded. I'm not aware of any legitimate reason why I need
to allow any UPX packed binary in via e-mail, so is there a way of blocking
any such file?
Cheers,
John
_
Arthur Sherman wrote:
Hi Jim,
What AV would you suggest for SAMBA?
Sorry, I have no suggestions as I have never tried to do this. We have
symantec AV on all our windows workstations and I use only clamav on our
mail server. Im sure others will have many suggestions.
-Jim
Best,
--
Erez Epstein wrote:
well, i'm not sure if thats the right solution, as smart virus or old
file with new virus definiton will not be found.
also i know all other virus scanners do scan all files.
Then perhaps you should be using other virus scanners. Use the tool
that best fits the job. If
well, i'm not sure if thats the right solution, as smart virus or old
file with new virus definiton will not be found.
also i know all other virus scanners do scan all files.
On 11/26/06, Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Erez Epstein wrote:
> and how can i shorten it while still scan
i'm running clamscan not the memory resident clamd, as the scan is run
only at night.
On 11/26/06, Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Erez Epstein wrote the following on 11/26/2006 1:24 AM -0800:
> Hello everybody,
>
>
> i have set up clamscan to scan all of the server using cron daily
> ( /
20 matches
Mail list logo
