hi list,
i am running clamav-0.88.7 for email scanning. i am
using qmail as my MTA, setup according to the qmr
instructions.
qmail-scanner-queue.pl does both the spam and virus
checks.
i know its possible to have spamassassin (spamd)
running on a remote machine and we can checked the
mails
Hi,
whats the timeetable for the release of 0.90 ??
I need this version because of fixed RAR-problem, and my customer is not happy
to use a release-candidate :-)
Kind Regards
Christian
--
Christian Kühn
(Technical Consultant / Hostmaster)
Hello,
Hi,
whats the timeetable for the release of 0.90 ??
Yeah, we all waiting for this new stable release :)
--
Cordialement / Best regards,
Arnaud Jacques
Consultant Sécurité
SecuriteInfo.com
http://www.securiteinfo.com
http://www.securiteinfo.net
On 01/02/2007 Christian Kuehn wrote:
| I need this version because of fixed RAR-problem, and my customer is
| not happy to use a release-candidate :-)
But they're happy to use a version with broken RAR archive handling?
--
Brian Morrison
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian Morrison wrote:
On 01/02/2007 Christian Kuehn wrote:
| I need this version because of fixed RAR-problem, and my customer is
| not happy to use a release-candidate :-)
But they're happy to use a version with broken RAR archive handling?
Not really, thats the reason they ask me once
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Arnaud Jacques wrote:
Yeah, we all waiting for this new stable release :)
I've been running 0.90rc2 here for a few months. IMHO it is more stable than
the 0.88.x I was running previously.
Just yeaterday I received a Bugzilla note from one I had submitted that it
was fixed
Christopher X. Candreva wrote
I've been running 0.90rc2 here for a few months. IMHO it is
more stable than
the 0.88.x I was running previously.
Just yeaterday I received a Bugzilla note from one I had
submitted that it
was fixed in 0.90rc3. I am taking that to mean we will see rc3
Randal, Phil wrote:
Christopher X. Candreva wrote
I've been running 0.90rc2 here for a few months. IMHO it is
more stable than
the 0.88.x I was running previously.
Just yeaterday I received a Bugzilla note from one I had
submitted that it
was fixed in 0.90rc3. I am taking that to mean we
Hmm
already successful compiled in Solaris 10_x86
SunOS rzviwa02 5.10 Generic_118855-19 i86pc i386 i86pc
works fine.
Kind Regards
Christian
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Randal, Phil wrote:
Christopher X. Candreva wrote
I've been running 0.90rc2 here for a few months. IMHO it is more
stable
Christian Kuehn wrote:
Hmm
already successful compiled in Solaris 10_x86
SunOS rzviwa02 5.10 Generic_118855-19 i86pc i386 i86pc
works fine.
Kind Regards
Christian
50-50 isn't bad. Can you share your configure params?
dp
___
Help us build a
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Dennis Peterson wrote:
50-50 isn't bad. Can you share your configure params?
Compiled fine on Solaris 8 Sparc, gcc 4.1.1, binutils 2.17
I configure with just ./configure --enable-milter
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 08:17:03AM -0800, Dennis Peterson said:
Randal, Phil wrote:
Christopher X. Candreva wrote
I've been running 0.90rc2 here for a few months. IMHO it is
more stable than
the 0.88.x I was running previously.
Just yeaterday I received a Bugzilla note from one I had
No problem:
./configure --prefix=/opt/clamav-0.9rc3 --with-user=exim --with-group=mail
--sysconfdir=/etc/clamav-0.9 --with-sendmail=/opt/exim/bin/exim
--enable-id-check CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/gmp/include LDFLAGS=-L/opt/gmp/lib
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Christian Kuehn wrote:
Hmm
already successful
Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Dennis Peterson wrote:
50-50 isn't bad. Can you share your configure params?
Compiled fine on Solaris 8 Sparc, gcc 4.1.1, binutils 2.17
I configure with just ./configure --enable-milter
It built to completion when I left out
Stephen Gran wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 08:17:03AM -0800, Dennis Peterson said:
Randal, Phil wrote:
Christopher X. Candreva wrote
I've been running 0.90rc2 here for a few months. IMHO it is
more stable than
the 0.88.x I was running previously.
Just yeaterday I received a Bugzilla note
Henrik Krohns wrote:
Pretty obvious that -liconv is missing. Using GNU iconv? Not rocket science
to fix. :)
-hk
Probably not - but RC2 continues to build fine. I'm only reporting what
I see. iconv is alive and well, I assure you :)
dp
___
Help
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 08:52:33AM -0800, Dennis Peterson said:
Henrik Krohns wrote:
Pretty obvious that -liconv is missing. Using GNU iconv? Not rocket science
to fix. :)
-hk
Probably not - but RC2 continues to build fine. I'm only reporting what
I see. iconv is alive and well, I
Stephen Gran wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 08:52:33AM -0800, Dennis Peterson said:
Henrik Krohns wrote:
Pretty obvious that -liconv is missing. Using GNU iconv? Not rocket science
to fix. :)
-hk
Probably not - but RC2 continues to build fine. I'm only reporting what
I see. iconv is alive
On 2/1/07, Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It built to completion when I left out --enable-experimental. It
definitely does not like that.
Thanks - haven't analyzed the problem yet, but am using the exact
environment and configure options as used to build RC2, and it builds
fine - I
Just tried 0.90rc3 as a milter with sendmail 8.14.0.
No go ):
Steve
Redirected virus to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Warning: URL
http://sdtger.yahujo.hk/?61039975 failed to download: server returned nothing
(no headers, no data)
LibClamAV Warning: URL http://www.wwateqrsblues.com failed to download:
20 matches
Mail list logo
