On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 08:08:12PM -0700, Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> Any suggestion what needs to be uncommneted here:
>
> --
>
> @av_scanners = (
>
> # ### http://www.vanja.com/tools/sophie/
> # ['Sophie',
> # \&ask_daemon, ["{}/\n", '/var/run/sophie'],
> # qr/(?x)^ 0+
On Monday 09 July 2007 19:28, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> On Jul 9, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Amavisd-new supports clamdscan just fine.
> >>>
> >>> Actually, it uses it's own code, which resembles clamdscan.
>
On Monday 09 July 2007 12:09, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2007, at 11:33 AM, Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> >> Nope, not really. That version of MailScanner should have native
> >> clamd
> >> support. Just start clamd, and tell MailScanner to use clamd, and
> >> the
> >> load will drop to lower than
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Jul 9, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Amavisd-new supports clamdscan just fine.
>>> Actually, it uses it's own code, which resembles clamdscan.
>> You're right-- perhaps I should have said, "it supports accessing
Is there a database of URLs which ClamAV refers to for determining Phishing?
Barracuda has our corporate URL greynium.com in their database (we are
trying to reach their support to understand why it has been included). I am
trying to check which databases have our URLs which could be causing the
pr
* Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Jul 9, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >> Amavisd-new supports clamdscan just fine.
> >
> > Actually, it uses it's own code, which resembles clamdscan.
>
> You're right-- perhaps I should have said, "it supports accessing
> clamd using the sa
On Jul 9, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> Amavisd-new supports clamdscan just fine.
>
> Actually, it uses it's own code, which resembles clamdscan.
You're right-- perhaps I should have said, "it supports accessing
clamd using the same mechanism that clamdscan uses". :-)
--
-Chuc
* Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Amavisd-new supports clamdscan just fine.
Actually, it uses it's own code, which resembles clamdscan.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame
Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 09:55 -0500, Eric Rostetter wrote:
>>
>>> On Monday 09 July 2007 03:13, Narayanan wrote:
Hi,
I am running Mailscanner 4.61 with clamav 0.88. Today i uninstalled old
version and installed clamav latest version 0.90.3.
>>> Big mist
On Jul 9, 2007, at 11:33 AM, Thomas Spuhler wrote:
>> Nope, not really. That version of MailScanner should have native
>> clamd
>> support. Just start clamd, and tell MailScanner to use clamd, and
>> the
>> load will drop to lower than ever levels.
>
> I wish Amavis would support clamd. It's
* Thomas Spuhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I wish Amavis would support clamd.
It does.
> It's in the amavis.conf file but it
> just doesn't use clamd but uses that backup clamscan and this is a
> disaster.
What's in the log? It uses clamd happily here...
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 09:55 -0500, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> Quoting Thomas Spuhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Monday 09 July 2007 03:13, Narayanan wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am running Mailscanner 4.61 with clamav 0.88. Today i uninstalled old
> >> version and installed clamav latest versio
Hi,
I get 2MB plain text report...
The milter is integrated into sendmail on CentOS4.5 (BlueQuartz).
How do I it so it wouldn't send me report on its every movement?
TIA!
Best,
--
Arthur Sherman
972-52-4878851
http://www.cpt.co.il/
___
Help us bu
Morgan Smith wrote:
> There may be some shortcomings of this script which I'm not realizing,
> and as such I welcome your opinions and suggestions.
It appears as though my handling of folder/filenames wasn't correct.
Line 33 which was:
echo $LINE | sed -e 's/: .*//g' | xargs --null rm -f
works a l
Hi,
A few days ago I've been running Sendmail with clamav 0.88 and since I
change to 0.90.3, I've been fighting with clam-milter and freshclam.
The freshclam dies when it tries to update the clam database and it isn't
able to reach the servers on the other hand clam-milter dies with this
error
Quoting Thomas Spuhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Monday 09 July 2007 03:13, Narayanan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am running Mailscanner 4.61 with clamav 0.88. Today i uninstalled old
>> version and installed clamav latest version 0.90.3.
>
> Big mistake
Nope, not really. That version of MailS
Just over a year ago there was a small discussion about a script
re-scanning a home directory periodically in hopes of detecting old
e-mail with new virus definitions. More recently, there have been many
discussions about using clamd vs clamscan. I would like to get opinions
and suggestions regardi
On Monday 09 July 2007 03:13, Narayanan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running Mailscanner 4.61 with clamav 0.88. Today i uninstalled old
> version and installed clamav latest version 0.90.3.
Big mistake See all the threads in this regard. I actually had to stop
scanning because many e-mail scans
Hi,
I am running Mailscanner 4.61 with clamav 0.88. Today i uninstalled old
version and installed clamav latest version 0.90.3. After installing new
version clam my CPU Load increasing continously because of these our users not
able to send and receive mails.
Can anyone help this how to so
19 matches
Mail list logo
