Re: [Clamav-users] clamd stuck at 100% cpu usage

2007-10-26 Thread Matt
- "Jeff Thurston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Im running clamav 91.2 (90.3 did the same thing). > After about an hour or so the clamd process gets stuck at 100%. > I've checked various logs for the cause and haven't found anything. > > Clamav is being run by amavis-new 2.3 if that info is o

Re: [Clamav-users] Vote for ClamAV as the best anti-malware solut ion

2007-10-26 Thread Bowie Bailey
I found a privacy policy here: http://www.scmagazineus.com/PrivacyPolicy/ but I can't quite figure out what it is trying to say. Bowie -Original Message- From: Michael Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 1:55 PM To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [Clamav-users

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV patch download not working in South Africa

2007-10-26 Thread Luca Gibelli
Hello Andrea, > Could you confirm whether the local server db.za.clamav.net had a problem > yesterday ? > Is that problem solved now ? are you running a version of freshclam <0.91 ? Best regards -- Luca Gibelli (luca _at_ clamav.net) ClamAV, a GPL anti-virus toolkit [Tel] +39 06 9165021

Re: [Clamav-users] Vote for ClamAV as the best anti-malware solut ion

2007-10-26 Thread Dennis Peterson
Bowie Bailey wrote: > I found a privacy policy here: > > http://www.scmagazineus.com/PrivacyPolicy/ > > but I can't quite figure out what it is trying to say. > > Bowie > It says clearly they will provide, possibly for a fee, possibly not, all your information to their contacts list. In addit

Re: [Clamav-users] Vote for ClamAV as the best anti-malware solut ion

2007-10-26 Thread Dave Warren
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Question: Why is this called a "privacy statement" rather than "an invasion of >privacy statement"? Just because their statement is "you have no privacy" doesn't change that fact that it's a privacy statement. At least t

Re: [Clamav-users] Vote for ClamAV as the best anti-malware solut ion

2007-10-26 Thread Dennis Peterson
Dave Warren wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dennis Peterson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Question: Why is this called a "privacy statement" rather than "an invasion >> of >> privacy statement"? > > Just because their statement is "you have no privacy" doesn't change > that fact tha