Rick Pim said the following, On 01/13/2010 11:11 AM:
Török Edwin writes:
> This patch might be needed:
> http://wiki.clamav.net/pub/Main/UpgradeNotes0953/patch-0.95.3-bug1737.diff
i couldn't get it to apply using the default vendor-supplied
tools -- hence the request for a hint or a patche
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Rick Pim wrote:
> Török Edwin writes:
> > This patch might be needed:
> > http://wiki.clamav.net/pub/Main/UpgradeNotes0953/patch-0.95.3-bug1737.diff
>
> i couldn't get it to apply using the default vendor-supplied
> tools -- hence the request for a hint or a patc
On 01/13/2010 07:11 PM, Rick Pim wrote:
> Török Edwin writes:
> > This patch might be needed:
> > http://wiki.clamav.net/pub/Main/UpgradeNotes0953/patch-0.95.3-bug1737.diff
>
> i couldn't get it to apply using the default vendor-supplied
> tools -- hence the request for a hint or a patched source
Török Edwin writes:
> This patch might be needed:
> http://wiki.clamav.net/pub/Main/UpgradeNotes0953/patch-0.95.3-bug1737.diff
i couldn't get it to apply using the default vendor-supplied
tools -- hence the request for a hint or a patched source kit.
rp
rick pim
On 01/13/2010 06:24 PM, Rick Pim wrote:
> i took a stab at compiling 0.95.3 on solaris 5.10 yesterday with the
> vendor-supplied gcc (3.4.3, compiled 0.95.1 just fine) and it failed,
> messily. before i dump stuff on the list:
>
> - is this a known issue?
> - is the patch mentioned on the websi
i took a stab at compiling 0.95.3 on solaris 5.10 yesterday with the
vendor-supplied gcc (3.4.3, compiled 0.95.1 just fine) and it failed,
messily. before i dump stuff on the list:
- is this a known issue?
- is the patch mentioned on the website (it mentions fedora and freebsd)
relevant for
