Hello
I searched the archives of this mailing-list (the web interface to the
archives of the ClamWin doesn't provide a search option) and read the links
provided in the subscription e-mail (www.clamav.net/support/ml,
www.clamav.net/support/faq, wiki.clamav.net), but only found a single thread
fro
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 06:08:38AM -0700, Fred-145 wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I searched the archives of this mailing-list (the web interface to the
> archives of the ClamWin doesn't provide a search option) and read the links
> provided in the subscription e-mail (www.clamav.net/support/ml,
> www.clam
ClamAV is not specifically designed to be a host-based AV although you
can use it as such. If you want a ClamAV solution specially designed
to run on end systems, check out ClamAV for Windows:
http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/about/win32/
-Alain
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Henrik K wrote:
> On
azidouemba wrote:
> ClamAV is not specifically designed to be a host-based AV although you
> can use it as such. If you want a ClamAV solution specially designed to
> run on end systems, check out ClamAV for Windows
Thanks for the link. I assume that ClamAV for Windows uses the same virus
databa
Fred-145 wrote:
> azidouemba wrote:
>
>> ClamAV is not specifically designed to be a host-based AV although you
>> can use it as such. If you want a ClamAV solution specially designed to
>> run on end systems, check out ClamAV for Windows
>>
>
> Thanks for the link. I assume that ClamAV for
Technically speaking, ClamAV is open-source. However, we do not
provide the code for ClamAV for Windows, therefore ClamAV for Windows
is close-source just like the other AV solutions you mentioned.
When it comes to whether ClamAV for Windows is going to fit your
needs, you will have to decide that
azidouemba wrote:
> When it comes to whether ClamAV for Windows is going to fit your
> needs, you will have to decide that for yourself.
Unfortunately, I don't have the time and skills for this, so I'd like to
read an unbiased and recent comparison.
I assume it's possible to setup a bunch of W
On 2010/05/11 8:48 PM, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
I don't know what the F= parameter does
F= tells sendmail what to do if the milter fails. I prefer F=T.
F=T means a temporary error, F=R means a permanent error, and no F=
means pass through as if the filter did not exist.
--
/Jason
smime.p
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Fred-145 wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't have the time and skills for this, so I'd like to
read an unbiased and recent comparison.
Google is your friend. The buzzword you need to remember is 'benchmark'.
I googled for 'antivirus benchmark' and the top result had a nice
long l
We've had a couple of legitimate messages hit on Sanesecurity.Junk.23771
within the last week or so.
'Trying to reach you again' is the supposed target text but that was no
where to be found in our (decoded) although there was similar text
--
Sincerely,
Adam Lanier
Voyant Strategies Inc.
___
> We've had a couple of legitimate messages hit on Sanesecurity.Junk.23771
> within the last week or so.
Hi Adam,
Signature fixed.
Sanesecurity False Positives should be reported to: false_positive AT
sanesecurity DOT me DOT uk.
More information here:
http://sanesecurity.co.uk/fps.htm
Cheers,
Charles Gregory wrote:
> The buzzword you need to remember is 'benchmark'. I googled for 'antivirus
> benchmark' and the top result had a nice long list.
Thanks for the tip. Is this the list?
"Aug 3rd, 05 - The Best of AntiVirus Rank"
http://forums.vr-zone.com/developers-software-discussion/300
Dud (Fred-145) do you work for a proprietary anti-virus company or something,
cuz it sounds like your just trying to dis??
Charles is right google IS your friend (a big behemoth who's time will soon
come):
http://www.builderau.com.au/blogs/byteclub/viewblogpost.htm?p=339270831
Also, if you
Sorry I copied and pasted so I must have missed that but it is there
and defined as
MilterSocket /var/run/clamd/clamav-milter.socket
Ah but I did find this
##
## Clamd options
##
# Define the clamd socket to connect to for scanning.
# This option is mandatory! Syntax:
# Clamd
Ah.. Thanks Jason...
I think I'll the F-ing option out :d pardon z frenche
> Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 10:25:34 -0400
> From: ja...@i6ix.com
> To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Can not get clamav-milter to work on Sendmail
>
> On 2010/05/11 8:48 PM, Shawn Bakhtiar
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Fred-145 wrote:
> I searched the archives of this mailing-list (the web interface to the
> archives of the ClamWin doesn't provide a search option) and read the links
> provided in the subscription e-mail (www.clamav.net/support/ml,
> www.clamav.net/support/faq, w
> ClamAV can only detect malware, it does not clean or even quarantine
> anything.
ClamAV does not just detect malware, it can can quarantine it.
> And it's geared toward e-mail, which means the focus of the AV DB will be
> threats that use e-mail as an attach vector. As such, you won't signatur
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Fred-145 wrote:
I couldn't find a recent comparison that came from a neutral source, ie. not
marketing material from a vendor or ad-based site. Does someone have a link?
I don't have anything current, and I lost the link a while back, but I
recall an interesting statistic
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Alain Zidouemba
wrote:
> > ClamAV can only detect malware, it does not clean or even quarantine
> > anything.
>
> ClamAV does not just detect malware, it can can quarantine it.
Since when? As long as I've been using it, it's been a detection-only
system. The fr
> Since when? As long as I've been using it, it's been a detection-only
> system. The frameworks that use ClamAV (milter, amavisd, etc) handle the
> quarantining. All ClamAV does is say "file good" or "file bad".
I guess it depends on how you use/implement ClamAV on your system.
When you instal
I rebooted and installed "ClamAV for Windows". I have a couple of questions:
1. Unless I missed it, the UI only allows scanning stuff in RAM, not files
on hard-disks. If this is correct, does it mean users are expected to also
install ClamWin to scan hard-disks?
2. Based on the input above, Clam
On 05/12/2010 09:40 PM, Fred-145 wrote:
>
> I rebooted and installed "ClamAV for Windows". I have a couple of questions:
>
> 1. Unless I missed it, the UI only allows scanning stuff in RAM, not files
> on hard-disks. If this is correct, does it mean users are expected to also
> install ClamWin to
> 1. Unless I missed it, the UI only allows scanning stuff in RAM, not files
> on hard-disks. If this is correct, does it mean users are expected to also
> install ClamWin to scan hard-disks?
The current version of ClamAV for Windows offers on-access scanning.
On-demand scanning is coming with the
Alain Zidouemba wrote:
> The current version of ClamAV for Windows offers on-access scanning.
> On-demand scanning is coming with the next release.
Thanks for the clarification. I didn't know what "on-access scanning" and
"on-demand scanning" meant. So at this point, ClamAV (on the Windows
platf
> Thanks for the clarification. I didn't know what "on-access scanning" and
> "on-demand scanning" meant. So at this point, ClamAV (on the Windows
> platform at least) isn't a single package, and requires both ClamWin and
> ClamAV for Windows, and possibly more (not sure if ClamWin scans for stuff
Fred-145 wrote:
> I rebooted and installed "ClamAV for Windows". I have a couple of questions:
>
Keep in mind that (at the moment), "ClamAV" and "ClamAV for Windows" are
two completely unrelated products.
> 1. Unless I missed it, the UI only allows scanning stuff in RAM, not files
> on hard-di
Fred-145 wrote:
> Alain Zidouemba wrote:
>
>> The current version of ClamAV for Windows offers on-access scanning.
>> On-demand scanning is coming with the next release.
>>
>
> Thanks for the clarification. I didn't know what "on-access scanning" and
> "on-demand scanning" meant. So at this
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Keep in mind that (at the moment), "ClamAV" and "ClamAV for Windows" are
> two completely unrelated products.
Yup, that's what other users said above. Unfortunately, the page about
ClamAV for Windows doesn't say anywhere that it only scans for malware in
RAM, not on mass-st
On 2010-05-12 22:50, Fred-145 wrote:
>
>
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> Keep in mind that (at the moment), "ClamAV" and "ClamAV for Windows" are
>> two completely unrelated products.
>
> Yup, that's what other users said above. Unfortunately, the page about
> ClamAV for Windows doesn't say anywhere th
ClamWin Free Antivirus is based on ClamAV engine and uses GNU General Public
License by the Free Software Foundation, and is free (as in freedom) software.
To find out more about GNU GPL, please visit the following link: Philosophy of
the GNU Project - Free Software Foundation.
Clam AntiVirus
On 2010-05-12 22:59, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
>
>
> ClamWin Free Antivirus is based on ClamAV engine and uses GNU General Public
> License by the Free Software Foundation, and is free (as in freedom)
> software. To find out more about GNU GPL, please visit the following link:
> Philosophy of the
Török Edwin wrote:
> It does scan files that are copied around on disks, or files that are
> executed from disks. In this version on-demand scanning has not been
> implemented, it will in
> a future version. That doesn't mean it doesn't protect you from threats.
Good. I think it'd be useful to m
Hi!
In the last week I noticed several times that freshclam needs up to 30
minutes using a full CPU to update safebrowsing database.
Most of the time the next update shows
Empty script safebrowsing-20426.cdiff, need to download entire database
What's wrong with safebrowsing?
Regards, Wolfgang
-
On 5/12/10 3:58 PM, Wolfgang Breyha wrote:
Hi!
In the last week I noticed several times that freshclam needs up to 30
minutes using a full CPU to update safebrowsing database.
Most of the time the next update shows
Empty script safebrowsing-20426.cdiff, need to download entire database
What's
34 matches
Mail list logo
