Twice this evening I've received errors, both when freshclam was trying
to submit detection stats. The first one was:
ERROR: SubmitDetectionStats: Remote server reported temporary failure:
SUBMIT_TEMPORARY_FAILURE:Server not available, try again later
And the 2nd was as is in the subject line.
T
On 2011-03-11 22:03, Russ Tyndall wrote:
>
> On Mar 11, 2011, at 1:32 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
>
>> So try clamscan --debug -rvi /path/to/folder 2>/dev/null, and see on
>> which file it crashes.
>
> "clamscan" or "clamDscan"? I am getting the crash in clamDscan. Clamscan
> processes the directo
On Mar 11, 2011, at 1:32 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
> So try clamscan --debug -rvi /path/to/folder 2>/dev/null, and see on
> which file it crashes.
"clamscan" or "clamDscan"? I am getting the crash in clamDscan. Clamscan
processes the directory successfully.
And if you meant clamDscan, do the ot
On 2011-03-11 19:05, Russ Tyndall wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running clamav 0.965 on a G5 with OS X Server 10.4.11.
>
> A launchdaemon automatically kicks off an overnight scan by sending a command
> to clamdscan.
>
> Starting last night, clamd began crashing while scanning a certain directory
>
Hello,
I'm running clamav 0.965 on a G5 with OS X Server 10.4.11.
A launchdaemon automatically kicks off an overnight scan by sending a command
to clamdscan.
Starting last night, clamd began crashing while scanning a certain directory
(crash log at the end of this message).
Calling clamscan m
Török Edwin wrote:
On 2011-03-11 15:14, Peter Bonivart wrote:
...
I also looked at a couple of servers where the hardware is 3-4 years
old and they took 5-7 seconds to reload. But they have a high load
from all mail related services they do, probably they could shave off
a second or two if teste
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:30:55 +0100 aCaB wrote:
> Whatever.
> Still 90 secs is unreasonable especially considering the older version
> was way better.
This can be caused by the bytecode.cvd. Please try without it.
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm
(\/)\. http://www.ClamAV
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Martin Preen
wrote:
> Sorry, but currently I can't use these package on that
> system (because of the library/package/path dependencies).
Not sure what you mean here? Everything from OpenCSW installs
separately from the rest of Solaris and doesn't affect it all, y
On 03/11/11 14:23, Török Edwin wrote:
>> I also looked at a couple of servers where the hardware is 3-4 years
>> old and they took 5-7 seconds to reload. But they have a high load
>> from all mail related services they do, probably they could shave off
>> a second or two if tested separately.
Than
On 2011-03-11 15:14, Peter Bonivart wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:03 PM, aCaB wrote:
>> On 03/10/11 20:58, Peter Bonivart wrote:
>>> You could give our ClamAV package a try:
>>>
>>> http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWclamav/
>>
>> Guys,
>> Anybody tried?
>>
>> I'd be very interested in hearin
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:03 PM, aCaB wrote:
> On 03/10/11 20:58, Peter Bonivart wrote:
>> You could give our ClamAV package a try:
>>
>> http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWclamav/
>
> Guys,
> Anybody tried?
>
> I'd be very interested in hearing the results.
I have obviously tried my own packages
aCaB wrote:
On 03/10/11 20:58, Peter Bonivart wrote:
You could give our ClamAV package a try:
http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWclamav/
Guys,
Anybody tried?
I'd be very interested in hearing the results.
>
Cheers,
--aCaB
Sorry, but currently I can't use these package on that
system (bec
On 03/10/11 20:58, Peter Bonivart wrote:
> You could give our ClamAV package a try:
>
> http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWclamav/
Guys,
Anybody tried?
I'd be very interested in hearing the results.
Cheers,
--aCaB
___
Help us build a comprehensive Cl
Martin Preen wrote:
Török Edwin wrote:
On 2011-03-10 21:58, Peter Bonivart wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Martin Preen
wrote:
Platform information
uname: solaris2.10
OS: solaris2.10, ARCH: sparc, CPU: sparc
Full OS version:Solaris 10 1/06
To answer to your questions, I use 0.97 too, and yes I am the one with the
128MB gateway. Concerning my first question, I disabled the mempool ; I
should then have no problem having 2 databases at the same time. Do you
think the functionality of asynchronous database reload could be added in
the fu
15 matches
Mail list logo
