Re: [clamav-users] Improving Scan Speeds on OS X.4.11

2011-03-18 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Mar 17, 2011, at 6:22 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote: > Since you're thinking in this direction you may discover locate is faster > than find though it has issues of it's own as well as opportunity. See more > at man locate. Locate searches a pre-built database rather than crawling your > file sys

Re: [clamav-users] Improving Scan Speeds on OS X.4.11

2011-03-18 Thread Dennis Peterson
On 3/18/11 10:18 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote: On Mar 17, 2011, at 6:22 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote: Since you're thinking in this direction you may discover locate is faster than find though it has issues of it's own as well as opportunity. See more at man locate. Locate searches a pre-built database

Re: [clamav-users] Improving Scan Speeds on OS X.4.11

2011-03-18 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote: >> Yes, and while locate is great for older files, is not really intended for >> detecting files which have appeared over the past day on a fileserver. By >> default, the locate DB is only rebuilt once a week under OS X > > It is entirely

Re: [clamav-users] Improving Scan Speeds on OS X.4.11

2011-03-18 Thread Dennis Peterson
On 3/18/11 11:12 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote: On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote: Yes, and while locate is great for older files, is not really intended for detecting files which have appeared over the past day on a fileserver. By default, the locate DB is only rebuilt once a week

Re: [clamav-users] Improving Scan Speeds on OS X.4.11

2011-03-18 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote: [ ... ] > Took a while but you're at least thinking. Please spare the readers of the list this sort of pointless sarcasm. *plonk* -- -Chuck ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit htt

Re: [clamav-users] Improving Scan Speeds on OS X.4.11

2011-03-18 Thread Dennis Peterson
On 3/18/11 11:29 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote: On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote: [ ... ] Took a while but you're at least thinking. Please spare the readers of the list this sort of pointless sarcasm. *plonk* That wasn't sarcasm. It was a complement. dp __

[clamav-users] Ignoring Adware

2011-03-18 Thread Fred Snertz
Is there a way to tell Clam not to alret on Adware? I see options that control PUAs and Broken binaries but not Adware. This seems like something I should have found in the FAQ or list archives but I did not. Thanks. ___ Help us build a comprehensive C

Re: [clamav-users] Improving Scan Speeds on OS X.4.11

2011-03-18 Thread Nathan Gibbs
* Dennis Peterson wrote: > It's Unix - you're allowed to think. > Awesome statement, :-D That made my day, Dennis. Thanks. :-) -- Sincerely, Nathan Gibbs Systems Administrator Christ Media http://www.cmpublishers.com ___ Help us build a comprehensi