Re: [clamav-users] Compiling and installing from an NFS mount

2012-03-14 Thread Jim Preston
On 03/14/2012 10:14 AM, Forrest Aldrich wrote: In our case, it's all the same revision/OS (RHEL 5.x) -- we have both 32- and 64-bit to contend with, therefore 2 separate builds ... I understand that. What I don't understand is why you don't just build your own RPM and have your mail filter

Re: [clamav-users] My outdated Clam.

2012-03-14 Thread Jim Preston
On 03/14/2012 05:12 AM, Steve Kirkby wrote: Shawn Bakhtiar said: "It's [Clam] not just good, it's great ". I am sure it is. But it is only for highly technically competent people. (And there is nothing wrong in that.) "Yes, the average consumer should not be concerned with such stuff, but if

Re: [clamav-users] Compiling and installing from an NFS mount

2012-03-14 Thread Peter Bonivart
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Forrest Aldrich wrote: >> There you go making life difficult for yourself again.  Why not set up >> your own ClamAV database mirror? > > I'm not sure how to do this; however, we have only about 4 or 5 machines > that poll for virus updates.   And the mirror would b

Re: [clamav-users] Compiling and installing from an NFS mount

2012-03-14 Thread Forrest Aldrich
On 3/14/12 7:43 AM, G.W. Haywood wrote: Hello again, On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Forrest Aldrich wrote: What's happening is the clamav installation (make install) creates a file *.tmp and removes it. This is why the process failed because I mount the directory read-only on most of the systems to pr

Re: [clamav-users] My outdated Clam.

2012-03-14 Thread Ralf Quint
At 08:50 AM 3/14/2012, Al Varnell wrote: On 3/14/12 5:12 AM, "Steve Kirkby" wrote: > > Exactly. But I dropped into Clam from a recommendation on the Apple > discussions Group. There are some highly technical people there but in the > post the recommender was addressing average uses of the Mac. >

Re: [clamav-users] My outdated Clam.

2012-03-14 Thread Al Varnell
On 3/14/12 5:12 AM, "Steve Kirkby" wrote: > Shawn Bakhtiar said: > > "It's [Clam] not just good, it's great ". > > I am sure it is. But it is only for highly technically competent people. (And > there is nothing wrong in that.) > > "Yes, the average consumer should not be concerned with such s

Re: [clamav-users] My outdated Clam.

2012-03-14 Thread Paul Kraus
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Steve Kirkby wrote: > Shawn Bakhtiar said: > > "It's [Clam] not just good, it's great ". > > I am sure it is. But it is only for highly technically competent people. (And > there is nothing wrong in that.) I disagree with that assertion. ClamAV in it's source

Re: [clamav-users] My outdated Clam.

2012-03-14 Thread Steve Kirkby
Shawn Bakhtiar said: "It's [Clam] not just good, it's great ". I am sure it is. But it is only for highly technically competent people. (And there is nothing wrong in that.) "Yes, the average consumer should not be concerned with such stuff, but if you'r on this list, I would hardly consider y

Re: [clamav-users] Compiling and installing from an NFS mount

2012-03-14 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hello again, On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Forrest Aldrich wrote: What's happening is the clamav installation (make install) creates a file *.tmp and removes it. This is why the process failed because I mount the directory read-only on most of the systems to prevent corruption. This is easily resolved b