The "ClamAV Virus Databases" FAQ
(http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/faq/faq-cvd/) says:
You can check for database update as often as 4 times per hour
provided that you have the following options in freshclam.conf:
DNSDatabaseInfo current.cvd.clamav.net
DatabaseMirror db.XY.clamav.net
D
We temporarily bumped the TTL up to three hours yesterday to ease the
burden on the mirrors while we pushed out a change that would cause a lot
of bandwidth. The TTL will be set back to its previous value soon.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Kees Theunissen
wrote:
> The "ClamAV Virus Databases
Hi, can somebody explain me why the 'contrib' top-level directory is
removed from the source tree in 0.97.6 tarball?
Somewhere i found that it is presented only in the development version
within github:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-devel
Moreover, even there, there are no more init scripts
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Shawn Webb wrote:
>We temporarily bumped the TTL up to three hours yesterday to ease the
>burden on the mirrors while we pushed out a change that would cause a lot
>of bandwidth. The TTL will be set back to its previous value soon.
Thanks.
That explains why I didn't see this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/15/13 8:15 AM, Ventsyslav Vassilev wrote:
> Hi, can somebody explain me why the 'contrib' top-level directory
> is removed from the source tree in 0.97.6 tarball?
This removal seems to have happened when we took over the release
engineering proce
On 02/15/2013 06:15 AM, Ventsyslav Vassilev wrote:
Hi, can somebody explain me why the 'contrib' top-level directory is
removed from the source tree in 0.97.6 tarball?
Somewhere i found that it is presented only in the development version
within github:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-devel
I suspect the explanation concerning DNS cache TTL may be playing a role here.
Try running freshclam in verbose mode to see if there is added info on the
daily.cvd download failure.
Sent from Janet's iPad
-Al-
--
Al Varnell
On Feb 15, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Lee Graves wrote:
> Still having prob
Here it is in verbose mode.
WARNING: Can't download daily.cvd from database.clamav.net
Trying again in 5 secs...
ClamAV update process started at Fri Feb 15 15:06:59 2013
Using IPv6 aware code
Querying current.cvd.clamav.net
TTL: 888
Software version from DNS: 0.97.6
WARNING: Your ClamAV installat
Due to some hiccups with pushing out a custom daily.cvd I tried to do, you
will need to delete the daily.cvd you have. You will download a fresh
daily.cvd. Sorry for any inconvenience.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Lee Graves wrote:
> Here it is in verbose mode.
>
> WARNING: Can't download d
On Feb 15, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Shawn Webb wrote:
> Due to some hiccups with pushing out a custom daily.cvd I tried to do, you
> will need to delete the daily.cvd you have. You will download a fresh
> daily.cvd. Sorry for any inconvenience.
Does this apply to everybody or just those unable to downl
It applies to those who are stuck on updates prior to daily.cvd version
16685.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Al Varnell wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Shawn Webb wrote:
>
> > Due to some hiccups with pushing out a custom daily.cvd I tried to do,
> you
> > will need to delete the dail
On Friday 15 February 2013 18:54:45 Shawn Webb did opine:
> Due to some hiccups with pushing out a custom daily.cvd I tried to do,
> you will need to delete the daily.cvd you have. You will download a
> fresh daily.cvd. Sorry for any inconvenience.
>
FWIW Shawn, my freshclam.log says it only erro
Am 14.02.2013 14:17, schrieb Daniel McDonald:
> But for the majority of us, It's not just potentially unwanted, it is simply
> unwanted. If I had wanted an open phone, I would have bought an Android.
That does of course heavily depend on your definition of "us".
I take it that it doesn't include
Is there any other way around this? It wouldn't be a big deal if it
was just a few boxes, but we've got quite a lot affected by this.
On 2013-02-15 23:41, Shawn Webb wrote:> It applies to those who are
stuck on updates prior to daily.cvd version> 16685.> > > On Fri, Feb
15, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Al Va
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Lee Graves wrote:
> Is there any other way around this? It wouldn't be a big deal if it
> was just a few boxes, but we've got quite a lot affected by this.
>
I wish there was, but there is not. I'm sorry for the inconvenience.
15 matches
Mail list logo
