FYI, Win32 now available too...
http://sourceforge.net/projects/clamav/files/clamav/win32/0.97.7/
Cheers,
Steve
Sanesecurity
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
I see that clamav is bundling llvm library along with its code.
* What does llvm buy me exactly for clamav? In other words, why do I
want to turn it on? Or do I even want to turn it on?
* I dont think bundling a library is such a great idea. Fortunately,
there is a --with-system-llvm switch in
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Eray Aslan wrote:
> I see that clamav is bundling llvm library along with its code.
>
> * What does llvm buy me exactly for clamav? In other words, why do I
> want to turn it on? Or do I even want to turn it on?
> * I dont think bundling a library is such a great
Dear ClamAV users,
"ClamAV 0.97.7 addresses several reported potential security bugs. Thanks to
Felix Groebert, Mateusz Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind of the Google Security
Team for finding and reporting these issues."
Download: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/clamav/clamav-0.97.7.tar.gz
PGP
All,
This is MY fault. No one else's.
I was tied up in another project yesterday and didn't get a chance to send the
announce blog post/email post out like I usually do.
Sorry about that all, it won't happen again.
Thanks.
--
Joel Esler
Senior Research Engineer, VRT
OpenSource Community Mana
Percy Kwong skrev den 14-03-2013 14:31:
Results: hostname1 works. hostname2 and hostname3 come back with,
"ERROR: Can't resolve LocalNet hostname unknown"
is it resolved if you add
127.0.0.2 hostname1
127.0.0.3 hostname2
127.0.0.4 hostname3
into /etc/hosts ?
order in /etc/hosts is fqdn firs
The year in the date on the most recent ChangeLog entry seems to be wrong.
-mm- (yes, that's my entire contribution)
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Small typo, but you are right. We can correct it so it's fixed going
forward.
Dave R.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Mark E. Mallett wrote:
> The year in the date on the most recent ChangeLog entry seems to be wrong.
>
> -mm- (yes, that's my entire contribution)
> __
