Re: [clamav-users] clamav 0.99 beta yara

2015-06-25 Thread Steven Morgan
Steve, One more question: is Sansecurity planning to distribute yara signatures when 0.99 final is released? This will help with appropriate scheduling of any parameter implementations. Thanks, Steve On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Steven Morgan wrote: > Steve, > > Thanks. We'll look into add

Re: [clamav-users] clamav 0.99 beta yara

2015-06-25 Thread Steven Morgan
Steve, Thanks. We'll look into additional command line/clamd.conf options to select or exclude signature types. This might be best done if/when Cisco ships yara signatures, since currently users are responsible for the content and locations of database directories regarding yara and these can easi

Re: [clamav-users] clamav 0.99 beta yara

2015-06-25 Thread Steven Morgan
Steve, Thanks for the pointers. We'll look in to adding a yara suffix, although it is not done for other sig types and it is also easy to grep the sig name within the database directory to identify the sig type/origin. As for whitelisting yara, that code should be already in place. I'll double c

Re: [clamav-users] clamav 0.99 beta yara

2015-06-25 Thread Steve Basford
Just a few more question to think about... 3) Clamscan --official-db-only=yes Will that only apply to ndb's or to Yara too... or do we need --official-yara-only=yes? 4) Clamscan --yara-signatures=no Will there be an option like the above to disable Yara sigs 5) Will there be an option to *on

[clamav-users] clamav 0.99 beta yara

2015-06-25 Thread Steve Basford
Couple of pre-coffee questions... 1) >From what I can tell Yara signature names will be generated based on the yara rule name provided... eg: testname.yara: rule Sanesecurity.test { strings: $match1 = "test" $ignore1 = "this1" $ignore2 = "this2" condition: $match1 and not ($ignore1 or $ignore2