[clamav-users] 800-53 (Rev. 4) Question {the first}

Can anyone answer the mail on this control enhancement in NIST 800-53 (Rev. 4) and if Clam AV has this in 0.99 release and if not, if anyone has any fodder or websites that can explain this more ... again many thanks and if this isn't the correct listserver to use for this many apologies. SI-3(7)

Re: [clamav-users] Freshclam Non-repudiation

Thanks for the quick replies and information, this helps greatly and is much appreciated! On Jan 29, 2016 03:28, "Steve Basford" wrote: > > On Thu, January 28, 2016 10:29 pm, Brad Scalio wrote: > > Is there any integrity or authenticity checks within freshclam

Re: [clamav-users] Freshclam Non-repudiation

On Thu, January 28, 2016 10:29 pm, Brad Scalio wrote: > Is there any integrity or authenticity checks within freshclam when it > connects to the clamAV servers to download the virus signature databases? Hi Brad, Just to cover 3rd Party (.UNOFFICIAL) signatures. Signatures produced by

Re: [clamav-users] 800-53 (Rev. 4) Question {the first}

ClamAV does provide for heuristic detection and its normal ruleset includes heuristic rule as does the UNOFFICIAL feeds.It meets the mail for NIST as well as DCID (and its followon regs) Tom > On Jan 29, 2016, at 7:01 AM, Brad Scalio wrote: > > Can anyone answer the mail on

Re: [clamav-users] Freshclam Non-repudiation

On 2016-01-29 23:28, Al Varnell wrote: Not sure how you would arrive at that conclusion. SaneSecurity is not affiliated with Cisco/SourceFire/ClamAV. sadly true :( hopefully all 3dr party sigs will be sourcefire signed oneday until then gpg works