Re: [clamav-users] Issue with ClamAV on Red Hat Enterprise Linux

If you completely installed ClamAV from RPM packages one would have installed sample copies of freshclam.conf and clamd.conf. Those files need to be edited after they're installed. Information for doing so can be found in the documentation at clamav.net. Specifically, freshclam.conf has the

Re: [clamav-users] Issue with ClamAV on Red Hat Enterprise Linux

Looks like permission errors. Is freshclam.conf and your database owned by the clamav user and are you running freshclam as such? -Al- On May 29, 2016, at 6:55 PM, Nathan Parker wrote: > Hi there! > > > Sorry it's taken me so long to respond. I've had issues

Re: [clamav-users] Issue with ClamAV on Red Hat Enterprise Linux

That error usually means that main.cvd is corrupted but since freshclam doesn’t even run I would start there, it might be just a matter of sorting out your /etc/freshclam.conf file > On May 29, 2016, at 6:55 PM, Nathan Parker > wrote: > > Hi there! > > > Sorry

Re: [clamav-users] Issue with ClamAV on Red Hat Enterprise Linux

Hi there! Sorry it's taken me so long to respond. I've had issues receiving the Daily Digests. Here's the error message I receive when I attempt to run freshclam: [parkernathan@redhatpc ~]$ freshclam ERROR: Please edit the example config file /etc/freshclam.conf ERROR: Can't open/parse

Re: [clamav-users] clamav users break dkim signed mails

Mail list servers and dkim are generally poorly compatible. I'm not aware of a way to send a signed message to a list then have the list resend it to all members while preserving the dkim signature. There's been no shortage of debate on the topic. Both yahoo and smtp are in a death spiral

[clamav-users] clamav users break dkim signed mails

so if yahoo.com users subscribe thay will later be unsubscribed as long as clamav users break dkim i see forward to have this solved aswell for yahoo.com users its not a option for me to ask yahoo.com to fix there dmarc, but please check my dmarc fail or pass, where did it break ? hopefully

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV+exim: scanner finds not a single malware

> On 29 May 2016, at 2:12 AM, Groach > wrote: > > But with SANE DEFINITIONS: > > --- SCAN SUMMARY --- > Known viruses: 4512349 > Engine version: 0.99.1 > Scanned directories: 0 > Scanned files: 24 > **Infected files: 23** > > Data scanned:

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV+exim: scanner finds not a single malware

On 29/05/16 10:22, Groach wrote: On 29/05/2016 10:19, kristen R wrote: It should be obvious although not mentioned that everyone who uses clamav is your fan club. I am a fan. I also believe that clamav is an open source project? So if someone doesn't like this product then they might submit

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV+exim: scanner finds not a single malware

This is too true. But is it possible that over time Virus Total/ClamAV results get so good that black hats give up? Sadly, seems to be an argument in favor of closed source. ...Chris >  > Probably worth pointing out that the black hats have an excellent tool at > their > disposal to test

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV+exim: scanner finds not a single malware

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 5/28/16 6:46 PM, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote: > A. I wish I had a fan club B. Thank you for your input. C. > We'll do better. > > -- Joel Esler Manager, Talos Group It should be obvious although not mentioned that everyone who uses clamav is your