Re: [clamav-users] Reporting malware/false negatives

That is a fundamentally different type of "free". I think that, all in all, the clamav folks do an amazing job with signature distribution, specially for submitted samples. > On Mar 21, 2017, at 6:41 PM, Al Varnell wrote: > > Actually, the still give their macOS/OS X

Re: [clamav-users] Reporting malware/false negatives

Actually, the still give their macOS/OS X product away for free. Sent from Janet's iPad -Al- On Mar 21, 2017, at 6:22 PM, "Joel Esler (jesler)" wrote: >> I don't even bother reporting them to sophos, et al because it's >> sometimes days before they're added. I was expecting better from >>

Re: [clamav-users] Reporting malware/false negatives

Inline. -- Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 21, 2017, at 20:27, Alex wrote: > > Hi, I reported an encrypted word macro virus this morning, and this > evening it is still not detected by sanesecurity or clamav proper. > > How long does it typically take for a sample to be

[clamav-users] Reporting malware/false negatives

Hi, I reported an encrypted word macro virus this morning, and this evening it is still not detected by sanesecurity or clamav proper. How long does it typically take for a sample to be analyzed and a pattern to be created? What is the typical procedure going on behind the scenes? Is this a

[clamav-users] ClamAV Scanning Algorithm

Hi All, I would like to know ClamAV Scanning Algorithm Internal logic could please anyone of you explain in detail Thanks, Crazy Thinker ___ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.clamav.net