Woah, I need to proof-read my emails better. I meant to say, "You shouldn't
need 'sudo' if your user can write to the directory.
Micah Snyder
ClamAV Development
Talos
Cisco Systems, Inc.
On Aug 21, 2018, at 12:45 PM, Micah Snyder (micasnyd)
mailto:micas...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hi Mike,
It
Hi Mike,
It depends on whether what your clamav database directory's user permissions
are set to. You shouldn't need freshclam if your user can write to the
directory.
At this time, ClamAV relies on the installer (or sys admin) to configure the
permissions.
If you install from source, the
On Aug 21, 2018, at 12:32 PM, G.W. Haywood
mailto:cla...@jubileegroup.co.uk>> wrote:
Hi there,
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018, Joel Esler wrote:
The amount of people using ClamAV version 0.90 and below is
surprising as well.
That's not really surprising to me. Most of them probably don't even
know
Hi there,
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018, Joel Esler wrote:
The amount of people using ClamAV version 0.90 and below is
surprising as well.
That's not really surprising to me. Most of them probably don't even
know that they're running it, and those who do could easily be lying
as it's trivial to forge
CC'ing your comments over to Micah. We have a heavy freshclam rewrite in the
pipeline.
The amount of people using ClamAV version 0.90 and below is surprising as well.
None of those versions support .diff files on the daily file. So, those
versions are downloading the whole daily.cvd
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 9:02 AM Steve Basford
wrote:
> On Tue, August 21, 2018 12:27 pm, Dave McMurtrie wrote:
> >
> > I'm beginning to get the feeling they don't have any type of review
> > process in place.
>
> I whitelisted the sig on the Sanesecurity mirrors this morning UK time:
>
>
On Tue, August 21, 2018 12:27 pm, Dave McMurtrie wrote:
>
> I'm beginning to get the feeling they don't have any type of review
> process in place.
I whitelisted the sig on the Sanesecurity mirrors this morning UK time:
21/08/2018 @ 11:37
It's usually quicker to do that, if not ideal.
--
Hello,
Do it yourself:
https://www.securiteinfo.com/services/anti-spam-anti-virus/whitelisting_clamav_signatures.shtml
Btw, users/customers of
https://www.securiteinfo.com/services/anti-spam-anti-virus/improve-detection-rate-of-zero-day-malwares-for-clamav.shtml
have no problem because the
OK, I don't think there is anything that ClamAV can do about it since it's an
UNOFFICIAL.
Maybe Steve Basford from SaneSecurity can put some pressure on them. He usually
reads what's posted here.
-Al-
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 04:27 AM, Dave McMurtrie wrote:
> They did this in April, 2017
They did this in April, 2017 also. When I reported it as a false positive
at that time, they responded with:
"Thank you for contacting us. There is a file hosted there with a vague
AV classification. After further reviewing it, we've decided to remove
the URL from our block lists and data
10 matches
Mail list logo
