MBL_17895395
MBL_17662054
MBL_17962226
Based on Steve’s suggestion, think it’s time to dump the list until MBL get
their act together and realise the situation
Paul Stead
Senior Engineer (Tools & Technology)
Zen Internet
Direct: 01706 902018
Web: zen.co.uk
Winner of 'Services Company of the Ye
Am 26.10.18 um 15:34 schrieb Johnny Time:
> For exemple, we wanted to authorize only a white list which contains
> *.doc,*.xls,*.pdf and ban the others extensions.
Surely you meant to write "*.docx,*.xlsx,*.pdf"?
*.doc and *.xls are the old, malware-prone MS-Office filetypes.
You don't want to let
Tilman Schmidt wrote:
Am 26.10.18 um 15:34 schrieb Johnny Time:
For exemple, we wanted to authorize only a white list which contains
*.doc,*.xls,*.pdf and ban the others extensions.
Surely you meant to write "*.docx,*.xlsx,*.pdf"?
*.doc and *.xls are the old, malware-prone MS-Office filetypes.
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 12:33:19 -0400, Kris Deugau stated:
>Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>> Am 26.10.18 um 15:34 schrieb Johnny Time:
>>> For exemple, we wanted to authorize only a white list which contains
>>> *.doc,*.xls,*.pdf and ban the others extensions.
>>
>> Surely you meant to write "*.docx,*.x
Am 26.10.18 um 15:34 schrieb Johnny Time:
For exemple, we wanted to authorize only a white list which contains
*.doc,*.xls,*.pdf and ban the others extensions.
Tilman Schmidt wrote:
Surely you meant to write "*.docx,*.xlsx,*.pdf"?
*.doc and *.xls are the old, malware-prone MS-Office filetypes
Jerry wrote:
We have a a steady flow of "*.doc", "*.docx" "*.xlsx" and *.pdf" files
exchanged with other offices. I have not seen a virus in any of them since
2010. Seems like you might be doing business with the wrong type of people.
I work for an ISP, managing our mail filtering services.
Th
All whitelisted this morning anyway.
Cheers,
Steve
Twitter: @sanesecurity
On 29 October 2018 10:21:13 am Paul Stead wrote:
MBL_17895395
MBL_17662054
MBL_17962226
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net
I have what is hopefully a quick question regarding clamd. What's a good method
for determining ideal chunk sizes when streaming data to the daemon over a
socket connection? Or should I ignore chunking altogether and just stream one
big contiguous file?
The background: I've developed a very sim
I have been seeing malware a .doc "resumé" delivered by e-mail to the ClamXAV
help desk several times a week recently.
-Al-
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Jerry wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 12:33:19 -0400, Kris Deugau stated:
>
>> Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>>> Am 26.10.18 um 15:34 schrieb Johnny
