That’s super interesting. I’d be interested in what the 6500 signatures were.
Just for a real world “what are you seeing” conversation.
Sent from my iPad
> On Mar 25, 2019, at 18:07, Graeme Fowler via clamav-users
> wrote:
>
> *decloaks*
>
> We (Loughborough University) use ClamAV on our
*decloaks*
We (Loughborough University) use ClamAV on our inbound and outbound mail
servers, in front of and after Office 365 mailboxes. It sits in the middle of a
fairly complex set of moving parts - another AV product, DNS blacklists, file
hash checks, local 'reputation', several anti-spam to
> People have been doing that kind of thing for years, I'm not sure how
> much it's increasing. Most of the time it seems to me they don't know
> why they're doing it nor even, if there is something in there to find,
> how likely it is that a ClamAV scan will find it.
I know people have been scan
We use it to scan entire Unix and Linux hosts.
Regards, Scott
> -Original Message-
> From: clamav-users On Behalf Of Joel
> Esler (jesler) via clamav-users
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 12:37 PM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Cc: Joel Esler (jesler) ; G.W. Haywood
>
> Subject: [External] R
Actually, from what we understand, ClamAV is mostly used to scan email.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 25, 2019, at 12:22, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users
> wrote:
>
> Although we share files with Windows platforms we really
> only use ClamAV to scan mail. I guess we're as untypical of a ClamA
Hi there,
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, J.R. wrote:
... I've seen an increasing amount of people posting about their
non-windows platforms that are scanning their *entire* system ...
People have been doing that kind of thing for years, I'm not sure how
much it's increasing. Most of the time it seems
On Fri 22/Mar/2019 16:14:28 +0100 Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 3/22/2019 10:54 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>
>> The only problem I have found is that
>> since my databases take so long to load, avfilter_sig times out when
>> reloading the
>> virus definitions. Is there a way to increase the timeout for
Hi Mark, all:
I’m disappointed to hear that it is still slow for you.
We found that the target-type of signatures used for PhishTank.Phishing
signatures were causing a significant slowdown. We have dropped them as of
this past Saturday ( https://lists.gt.net/clamav/virusdb/75279 ) and in the
Vladislav,
The should have worked if the new version of zlib has been installed to
/usr/local.
On a side note, have you considered upgrading to a new version of Linux?
Centos5 has passed End-of-Life.
Micah
From: clamav-users on behalf of
Владислав Гришин
Reply-To: ClamAV users ML
Date: Fr
Cheers Steve,
In the interest of completeness, here's the scan from today (TXT from DNS:
0.101.1:58:25399:1553509741:1:63:48528:328) showing a marked improvement in
scan time, although at 6m 7s it's still almost twice what it used to be.
Mark
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 12:56, Steve Basford
wrote:
Our signatures cover all platforms. Sorry, can’t type on watch. :)
Sent from my iPad
> On Mar 25, 2019, at 08:20, Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users
> wrote:
>
> Our signature is cover all platforms.
>
> Sent from my Apple Watch
>
>> On Mar 25, 2019, at 08:13, J.R. via clamav-users
>>
On 2019-03-25 10:52, Mark Allan via clamav-users wrote:
Hi all,
te.
Hopefully this helps someone to narrow things down a bit.
Mark
18/3/19 10m 49s TXT from DNS:
0.101.1:58:25392:1552904941:1:63:48507:328 ***
Here's the changes for the above update:
https://lists.gt.net/clamav/virusd
Our signature is cover all platforms.
Sent from my Apple Watch
On Mar 25, 2019, at 08:13, J.R. via clamav-users
wrote:
> I keep thinking about this from time to time, but keep forgetting to
> post before I get sidetracked doing something else...
>
> Are the ClamAV default signature files gear
I keep thinking about this from time to time, but keep forgetting to
post before I get sidetracked doing something else...
Are the ClamAV default signature files geared towards Windows
executables / malware / documents / (generic spam)? Or do they cover
other platforms as well?
Reason I'm asking,
Hi all,
We've been experiencing this slowdown too. We run every DB update through
an extra FP test against a number of recent Mac OS installs (OS X 10.6 -
10.14, as well as some well-known 3rd party apps) just to weed out any
potentially overzealous signatures. On the new Mac Minis this FP test u
15 matches
Mail list logo
