Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.102.4 crash in test directory

2020-08-10 Thread Zvi Kave via clamav-users
Hi, You are right. The crash is specific to my build. On Ubuntu it works well. I shall open a ticket to supply more information. Thank you, Zvi On 8/9/2020 4:37 PM, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote:

[clamav-users] PhishingScanURLs no/yes

2020-08-10 Thread Paul via clamav-users
Hi Can anybody explain why when  "PhishingScanURLs  no "   I get Loaded 9042923 signatures in logs and when "PhishingScanURLs  yes" I get Loaded 11256306 signatures I would have expected the difference to be the count of urls in daily.pdb (263) not 2,213,383.  What else is not getting loaded

Re: [clamav-users] PhishingScanURLs no/yes

2020-08-10 Thread G.W. Haywood via clamav-users
Hi there, On Mon, 10 Aug 2020, Paul via clamav-users wrote: Can anybody explain why when  "PhishingScanURLs  no "   I get Loaded 9042923 signatures in logs and when "PhishingScanURLs  yes" I get Loaded 11256306 signatures I would have expected the difference to be the count of urls in daily.

Re: [clamav-users] PhishingScanURLs no/yes

2020-08-10 Thread Paul via clamav-users
On 10/08/2020 15:10, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote: Hi there, On Mon, 10 Aug 2020, Paul via clamav-users wrote: Can anybody explain why when "PhishingScanURLs  no "   I get Loaded 9042923 signatures in logs and when "PhishingScanURLs  yes" I get Loaded 11256306 signatures I would ha

Re: [clamav-users] PhishingScanURLs no/yes

2020-08-10 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
On 11/08/2020 00:53, Paul via clamav-users wrote: [SNIP] Further digging has led me to find that when 'PhishingScanURLs no" is set the signatures in safebrowsing.cld are not loaded by clamd. Well, there's a win for plain and simple use of the English language (or a close approximation the