Hi
Do I have reason to be concerned that my systems could not download
yesterday's daily cdiff until the early hours of today. They are all
0.103.(2|3) release.version
The experiment did not appear to impact many folk
Regards Paul
On 05/09/2021 03:45, Joel Esler (jesler) via clamav-users w
Joel Esler clamav-users@lists.clamav.net wrote:
We are experimenting with a feature that we’ve been working with Cloudflare on,
trying to isolate violators on a per host basis for the newest versions of
ClamAV, instead of IP.
I'm guessing you probably already have all the info you need but, i
This is useful. Thank you.
Each host should have a different rate limit under the new system (I turned it
back off last night, which is why everyone got everything).
Right now, the rate limit is “per IP”. So, if you have several
Hosts behind a NAT, so you’ll get blocked. The new system, you
Hi Joel
I have 4 hosts each on a unique IP in the net 212.84.90.0/25. They all
run the command "/usr/bin/freshclam --quiet --on-update-execute=EXIT_1
" once per hour.
As far as I am aware this is within limits.
So why did all 4 of my systems report the same issue for most of
yesterday and
No problem; good to know it was useful.
In my case, only the one host behind the NAT (physical PC on a home
broadband connection) is running freshclam anyway, but it appears I was
still being blocked by the rate-limiting. As I understand it, that
shouldn't usually have happened even with the
Thank you for being patient while I try some different things to find the
middle ground.
—
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 5, 2021, at 12:16, clamav.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
>
> No problem; good to know it was useful.
>
> In my case, only the one host behind the NAT (physical PC on a h
Maybe I’ll ask you to experiment with me when I try again? Have you modify
some things?
—
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 5, 2021, at 12:12, Paul Netpresto wrote:
>
> Hi Joel
>
> I have 4 hosts each on a unique IP in the net 212.84.90.0/25. They all run
> the command "/usr/bin/freshclam -
On Sun, 5 Sep 2021 02:45:25 +
"Joel Esler \(jesler\) via clamav-users" wrote:
> We are experimenting with a feature that we’ve been working with Cloudflare
> on, trying to isolate violators on a per host basis for the newest versions
> of ClamAV, instead of IP.
-
Maybe what we have se
Now?
—
Sent from my iPad
> On Sep 5, 2021, at 12:51, Paul Kosinski wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Sep 2021 02:45:25 +
> "Joel Esler \(jesler\) via clamav-users"
> wrote:
>
>> We are experimenting with a feature that we’ve been working with Cloudflare
>> on, trying to isolate violators on a pe
On Sun, 5 Sep 2021 18:27:09 +
"Joel Esler (jesler)" wrote:
> Now?
-
All 3 systems updated successfully as soon as our DNS TXT test said the 26285
update was available (see below).
This is again as it is almost every time since the download limiting mechanism
s
10 matches
Mail list logo
