‎Hi Clayton,

Use lowercase for the filename or go to www.clamav.net click on Download, scroll down to the Windows packages and select the one you require.

Regards,

Andy.


From: Clayton Bugeja
Sent: Wednesday, 27 March 2019 11:20
To: ClamAV users ML
Reply To: ClamAV users ML
Cc: G.W. Haywood
Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Are signatures for Windows only?

Hi Everyone,

Can you please try this link see if you can download the file as for us its not working: http://www.clamav.net/downloads/production/ClamAV-0.101.2.exe

we are getting this message: 

This page isn’t working

www.clamav.net is currently unable to handle this request.

HTTP ERROR 500

Best Regards

Clayton Bugeja

_________________________________

System Administrator

Transactium Ltd.


Tel: (356) 2333 3000

Direct: (356) 2333 7109


Email: clayton@transactium.com

Web: www.transactium.com

 

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify Clayton@transactium.com Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.



On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:08 PM G.W. Haywood via clamav-users <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> wrote:
Hi there,

On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Joel Esler wrote:

> On Mar 25, 2019, at 12:22, G.W. Haywood via clamav-users ... wrote:
>
> > ... we really only use ClamAV to scan mail.  I guess we're as
> > untypical of a ClamAV user as you'll get.
>
> Actually, from what we understand, ClamAV is mostly used to scan email.

Quite so.

On Tue, 26 Mar 2019, Graeme Fowler wrote:

> We (Loughborough University) use ClamAV ...

Unfortunately when I was at Loughborough University (Electronic and
Electrical Engineering) ClamAV did not exist.  Nor did the Internet,
as I graduated in 1976 (*). :/

> Picking a random recent day, we had 135000 rejections, 6500 of which
> were from ClamAV. By comparison, we accepted & delivered 25000
> messages ...

On that day's numbers it looks like ClamAV is rejecting about 5% of
rejected mail.  Here, in fifteen months, it's rejected _less_ than
0.0002% (although I'll grant that both are likely poor statistics).

On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, J.R. wrote:

> Yep, other measures for me too has meant that ClamAV *might* get one
> hit a day, which typically is a 3rd party phishing signature. I'm
> sure if ClamAV didn't catch it the email would still have been
> flagged and deleted as spam from other measures.
>
> > It's a while since I looked at this, so I did a few 'grep's on 'daily':
>
> You inspired me to take a look at the signature files ...

Excellent!  I like to inspire. :)

Obviously I didn't mean that using ClamAV to scan mail is untypical,
it's our 0.0002% detection rate which I think might be untypical.  I
should be very concerned if I relied on *any* anti-virus package to
stop one in twenty malicious payloads.  Not that I'm saying LU does,
there isn't enough information here to make that call.  But my guess
is that the typical ClamAV user feels that, if a message has been
scanned, it's probably safe to use a mail client's GUI to read it.
I'm pretty sure that it isn't (and my mail client doesn't have one,
and I'm *sure* that's untypical).

On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Joel Esler wrote:

> That?s super interesting.  I?d be interested in what the 6500
> signatures were.  Just for a real world ?what are you seeing?
> conversation.

As Micah said:

On Tue, 26 Mar 2019, Micah Snyder wrote:

> We had hoped to re-implement it for 0.102.  I'm still crossing my
> fingers that we can get it done

It could be valuable to us to have the fed back information published
but you can see how it might be valuable to the wrong people too.

> but we've lost a lot of time working on improving ClamAV code
> quality and security.

That's not lost time.  It's time well used. :)

--

73,
(*) G.W. Haywood, BSc (1st hons 1976), CEng, MIET, MRIN.

_______________________________________________

clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

_______________________________________________

clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Reply via email to