Re: [Clamav-users] WARNING: Suspicious recipient address blocked

2008-04-14 Thread Bas van Rooijen
Bit Fuzzy wrote: > Alan Stern wrote: >> There's certainly something wrong here. The open and close bracket >> characters ('[' and ']', items 19 and 21) can indeed be part of a valid >> email address. For example: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > There's a difference between "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" whi

Re: [Clamav-users] WARNING: Suspicious recipient address blocked

2008-04-14 Thread Bas van Rooijen
John Rudd wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Bas van Rooijen wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for the replies so far; >>>> >>>> however please note I already know the problem is ClamAV (hence i'm >>>

Re: [Clamav-users] WARNING: Suspicious recipient address blocked

2008-04-14 Thread Bas van Rooijen
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Bas van Rooijen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ClamAV is rejecting messages where the recipient address contains a | (pipe >> character).. >> >> Why is this? Is | a virus now? >> >> Can this behaviour be dis

Re: [Clamav-users] WARNING: Suspicious recipient address blocked

2008-04-14 Thread Bas van Rooijen
Mon Apr 14 13:07:57 2008 -> WARNING: Suspicious recipient address blocked: 'test|[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Bas van Rooijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Yes. I'm certain ClamAV is behind it; we're using postfix with ClamAV-milter, >

Re: [Clamav-users] WARNING: Suspicious recipient address blocked

2008-04-14 Thread Bas van Rooijen
Rob MacGregor wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Bas van Rooijen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ClamAV is rejecting messages where the recipient address contains a | (pipe >> character).. >> >> Why is this? Is | a virus now? >> >>

[Clamav-users] WARNING: Suspicious recipient address blocked

2008-04-14 Thread Bas van Rooijen
ClamAV is rejecting messages where the recipient address contains a | (pipe character).. Why is this? Is | a virus now? Can this behaviour be disabled? Are you planning on blocking other random characters from appearing in the recipient adres? thanks, bvr. __