[clamav-users] Probable False Positive: Unix.Trojan.Mirai-5607459-1

2017-01-26 Thread Mark Edwards
So far 150 of 300 CentOS 7 servers reporting: /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn: Unix.Trojan.Mirai-5607459-1 FOUND The signature was released in virusdb 22949 this afternoon (EST). Anybody else seeing this? Appears to be a false positive. -- *Mark Edwards | Cloud Operations Manager | TraceLink Inc

[clamav-users] Probable False Positive - OpenJDK-1.8 nashorn.jar : Win.Trojan.Toa-5370166-0

2016-12-26 Thread Mark Edwards
like confirmation and an update before tonight's run, if possible Thanks. -- *Mark Edwards | Cloud Operations Manager | TraceLink Inc.* Amazon AWS Global Start-Up Challenge – Grand Prize Winner! ___ clamav-users mailing list clamav-users@lists.

Re: [Clamav-users] fyi: 0.65 on OSX

2004-01-28 Thread Mark Edwards
Well, despite my better judgement I decided to go ahead and install clamav-devel-20040110 on my OSX 10.1.5 machine. Seems to work well, as far as I can tell. Tests run fine. The only issues I've had are freshclam's -c flag seems broken: [dina:/var/log/clamav] engineer% sudo freshclam -d -c 2

Re: [Clamav-users] fyi: 0.65 on OSX

2004-01-27 Thread Mark Edwards
Well, despite my better judgement I decided to go ahead and install clamav-devel-20040110 on my OSX 10.1.5 machine. Seems to work well, as far as I can tell. Tests run fine. The only issues I've had are freshclam's -c flag seems broken: [dina:/var/log/clamav] engineer% sudo freshclam -d -c 2

Re: [Clamav-users] fyi: 0.65 on OSX

2004-01-27 Thread Mark Edwards
On Jan 23, 2004, at 10:28 AM, OpenMacNews wrote: given the flurry of discussion re: clamav on OSX, i though i'd just offer as an fyi, 0.65 builds/runs flawlessly for me on OSX 10.2.x & 10.3.x on a variety of stock & upgraded boxes. I can confirm that it builds find on 10.3. i can't say i agree w

Fwd: [Clamav-users] fyi: 0.65 on OSX

2004-01-27 Thread Mark Edwards
I got bizarre errors with my last two posts, so here goes again. Sorry if this double-posts... On Jan 23, 2004, at 10:28 AM, OpenMacNews wrote: given the flurry of discussion re: clamav on OSX, i though i'd just offer as an fyi, 0.65 builds/runs flawlessly for me on OSX 10.2.x & 10.3.x on a va

Re: [Clamav-users] OSX build problem with 0.65

2004-01-23 Thread Mark Edwards
On Jan 23, 2004, at 12:21 AM, Nigel Horne wrote: On Thursday 22 Jan 2004 9:22 pm, Mark Edwards wrote: I think it's server-th.c As far as I can tell, that file doesn't exist in the 0.65 source. What's the full path? Ahah - you'll need the latest CVS source for that, should h

Re: [Clamav-users] OSX build problem with 0.65

2004-01-22 Thread Mark Edwards
On Jan 22, 2004, at 1:10 PM, Nigel Horne wrote: On Thursday 22 Jan 2004 7:33 pm, Mark Edwards wrote: I tried making the changes to clamd/server.c and I still get the same build errors. Is server.c the right file to change? It doesn't look exactly the same as what you listed. Your listin

Re: [Clamav-users] OSX build problem with 0.65

2004-01-22 Thread Mark Edwards
ges to clamd/server.c and I still get the same build errors. Is server.c the right file to change? It doesn't look exactly the same as what you listed. Your listing has an #include "session.h" that is not in the raw source. I tried adding it as well,

Re: [Clamav-users] OSX build problem with 0.65

2004-01-21 Thread Mark Edwards
On Jan 21, 2004, at 3:11 AM, Nigel Horne wrote: These changes will make clamd compile under OSX10.1. The bad news is it's rather doubtful that ClamAV supports that operating system any more. It's best to ask Tomasz to put the support back in. The good news is that this part of the code is only

[Clamav-users] OSX build problem with 0.65

2004-01-20 Thread Mark Edwards
Build of clamav-0.65 on OSX 10.1.4 dies in the following manner: /usr/bin/ld: warning unused multiple definitions of symbol _optarg "link editor" definition of _optarg in section (__DATA,__common) /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib(getopt.o) unused definition of _optarg /usr/bin/ld: warning unused multiple