Re: [clamav-users] How can I have clamd reject items that can't be scanned?

2011-11-09 Thread Rob Sterenborg (lists)
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 10:31 +0100, Per Jessen wrote: > Peter Bradeen wrote: > > > I see that there are ways to limit the level of archive that will be > > scanned as well as the size of the entities to be scanned. Is there a > > way for CLAMAV to then flag them as not allowed? Seem that if you >

Re: [clamav-users] Untit Testing

2012-02-06 Thread Rob Sterenborg (Lists)
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 11:39 -0800, Reynolds, David C. wrote: > I've recently installed .97.3 on an SGI Origin 3000 running TRIX > v6.5.28 using gcc 3.2.1. (I did need to make some source file > modifications). I was able to run clamscan against a directory > seemingly without error. > > However

Re: [clamav-users] clamd network mode

2012-04-18 Thread Rob Sterenborg (Lists)
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 12:13 -0500, Tom Goerger wrote: > Hi, > > We're running clamav on our mta servers right now, each in local mode. > We're experiencing some high loads causing mail delays on these servers, I can imagine if you're using clamscan. > and are trying to offload some of their res

Re: [clamav-users] Can't download v0.97.5 source code

2012-07-26 Thread Rob Sterenborg (Lists)
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 15:35 -0400, Ruiyuan Jiang wrote: > Hi, > > I could not download the ClamAV v0.97.5 source code since yesterday. Does > anyone know what happened? When I try to download I'm redirected to SourceForge and I can download 0.97.5 just fine. http://sourceforge.net/projects/cla

Re: [clamav-users] Clamav update problem

2012-08-13 Thread Rob Sterenborg (lists)
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 13:53 +0400, Ильяс Досхожаев wrote: > i updated clamav to last 0.97.5 on debian , nevertheless it show error > #freshclam > ClamAV update process started at Mon Aug 13 15:49:41 2012 > WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! > WARNING: Local version: 0.97.3 Recommende

Re: [clamav-users] Detection of Win32 Trojan / Dorifel

2012-08-21 Thread Rob Sterenborg (lists)
On 08/20/2012 02:43 PM, Joel Esler wrote: > On Aug 20, 2012, at 7:46 AM, "Birgelen, Jeroen van" > wrote: > >> LS, >> >> I would kindly like to request some information on whether ClamAV is >> detecting the Dorifel Trojan/virus which is currently spreading (at least in >> The Netherlands), sinc

Re: [clamav-users] Detection of Win32 Trojan / Dorifel

2012-08-22 Thread Rob Sterenborg (lists)
On 08/22/2012 08:51 PM, Alain Zidouemba wrote: > Look for the signature: WIN.Worm.Dorifel Great, thanks a bunch! -- Rob ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Re: [clamav-users] vscan-clamav

2013-05-16 Thread Rob Sterenborg (lists)
On 16-05-13 14:06, jens s wrote: Dear If I do understand you I'll have to make a cronjob with clamscan command in it wich will scann my whole system specifying the folders I want it to scan. That would be clamdscan (notice the d in between) instead. - Clamscan is the standalone command line

Re: [clamav-users] Compiler error: 7z/Types.h:58: redefinition of `Byte'

2013-09-23 Thread Rob Sterenborg (lists)
On 09/23/2013 05:45 PM, Shawn Webb wrote: This is due to a change I had made in November 2012 to how the zlib linking checks are done in the configure script. If you have a few extra moments, can you apply the below-pasted patchfile and re-run configure? If your compile works with just this patch

Re: [clamav-users] Compiler error: 7z/Types.h:58: redefinition of `Byte'

2013-09-24 Thread Rob Sterenborg (lists)
On 09/24/2013 03:51 PM, Shawn Webb wrote: On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote: On 9/23/13 1:59:42PM, Shawn Webb wrote: Maybe this time I'll actually attach the patch. ;) I believe the list server discourages attachments. dp Did the patch not go through? No it di

Re: [clamav-users] Compiler error: 7z/Types.h:58: redefinition of `Byte'

2013-09-25 Thread Rob Sterenborg (lists)
On 09/25/2013 07:47 PM, Shawn Webb wrote: Hey Francis, Can you add the --disable-silent-rules option to your configure script and re-run make? It'd be helpful to see what's being passed to the compiler. I didn't do this, but.. Here's a small patch that might help. Can you give this a try and