On Saturday 05 January 2008, zamri wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2008 9:00 PM, Luis Miguel R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > El Saturday, 05 January del 2008 a las 11:19:56AM, zamri escribió:
> > > I tried to access certain sites and it has been detected containing
> >
> > virus. I
> >
> > > use dansguardian
On Saturday 05 January 2008, Luis Miguel R. wrote:
> El Saturday, 05 January del 2008 a las 11:19:56AM, zamri escribió:
> > I tried to access certain sites and it has been detected containing
> > virus. I use dansguardian s.9.9.2 + clamav 0.92. I remember one right
> > now. If you have found one, p
be writable for UID 1000 or GID 1000
> ERROR: Can't download daily.cvd from database.clamav.net
> LibClamAV Error: Database
> Directory: /home/alessandro/clamav/share/clamav not locked
>
>
>
> What should I have to do to fix it?
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> _
On Monday 29 October 2007 18:07, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> John Rudd wrote:
> > John Rudd wrote:
> >> I can produce 2 examples of messages that cause the problem, in RFC822
> >> format, for anyone who wants to experiment with them.
> >
> > I decided I'd just go ahead and make them available:
> >
> >
On Sunday 15 July 2007 08:50, David Boltz wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> I've made the switch to clamd with the latest MailScanner that has direct
> support for clamd. The speed is much much improved from the clamscan. It
> might be worth looking into this. I'm glad I did.
>
> Regards,
> -
On Sunday 15 July 2007 08:50, David Boltz wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> I've made the switch to clamd with the latest MailScanner that has direct
> support for clamd. The speed is much much improved from the clamscan. It
> might be worth looking into this. I'm glad I did.
>
> Regards,
> -
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 10:15 -0600, Morgan Smith wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> /etc/amavis/amavis.conf calls for clamAV via:
> >>> ['Clam Antivirus-clamd',
> >>> \&ask_daemon, ["CONTSCAN {}\n", "/var/run/clamav/clamd.ctl"],
> >> My config differs from yours right here ^^^
On Monday 09 July 2007 19:28, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> On Jul 9, 2007, at 12:17 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Amavisd-new supports clamdscan just fine.
> >>>
> >>> Actually, it uses it's own code, which resembles clamdscan.
>
On Monday 09 July 2007 12:09, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2007, at 11:33 AM, Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> >> Nope, not really. That version of MailScanner should have native
> >> clamd
> >> support. Just start clamd, and tell MailScanner to use clamd, and
> &g
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 09:55 -0500, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> Quoting Thomas Spuhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Monday 09 July 2007 03:13, Narayanan wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am running Mailscanner 4.61 with clamav 0.88. Today i uninstalled
On Monday 09 July 2007 03:13, Narayanan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running Mailscanner 4.61 with clamav 0.88. Today i uninstalled old
> version and installed clamav latest version 0.90.3.
Big mistake See all the threads in this regard. I actually had to stop
scanning because many e-mail scans
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 23:38, Alexandros G. Fragkiadakis wrote:
> On Wed, July 4, 2007 18:00, Salvatore wrote:
> > Hi, I use clamav-0.90.3 (with amavisd-new-2.2.1, maia-1.0.2 and
> > postfix-2.2.8) but for some days the system is very slow, pheraps the
> > problem is in the cpu load (my CPU is I
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 07:45, Captain Hook wrote:
> Hi, guys,
>
> I would like to ask one question.
> I currently updated amavisd-new-2.5.2,1 clamav-0.90.3 in FreeBSD, and it
> turned out the speed of sending out and receiving the email becomes so
> slow.
>
> I discovered that amavisd-new is pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Rostetter wrote:
I posted on another list as well, but thought this may gets more
attention from the developers:
>
> They are well aware of it.
>
Clamscan is extremely slow and CPU hungry. clamscan a pdf file of about
1.2 MB
On Sunday 17 June 2007 11:52, Daniel Staal wrote:
> --As of June 17, 2007 11:44:04 AM -0700, Thomas Spuhler is alleged to have
>
> said:
> >> Use clamdscan instead of clamscan.
> >
> > That doesn't improve clamscan.
> > (I can use a free commercial that is
On Sunday 17 June 2007 08:43, Török Edvin wrote:
> On 6/17/07, Thomas Spuhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I posted on another list as well, but thought this may gets more
> > attention from the developers:
> > Clamscan is extremely slow and CPU hungry. clamscan a p
On Saturday 16 June 2007 19:07, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> > I posted on another list as well, but thought this may gets more
> > attention from the developers:
> > Clamscan is extremely slow and CPU hungry. clamscan a pdf file of about
> > 1.2 MB
I posted on another list as well, but thought this may gets more attention
from the developers:
Clamscan is extremely slow and CPU hungry. clamscan a pdf file of about 1.2 MB
and it takes about 1 minute. Same file with a commercial scanner takes 2 sec.
This wasn't always like this. As a result, c
On Monday 04 June 2007 03:23, Rob Sterenborg wrote:
> >> Yes I'm aware of that. But.. clamdscan was as "slow" as clamscan as
> >> clamavmodule.
> >
> > I would suggest that you either use clamdscan or clamavmodule. The
> > time required for clamscan to load virus signatures (100 thousand or
> > so)
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 02:08, net2u.ro wrote:
> helo
>
> i made the upgrade today
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/kit/clamav-0.90# /usr/local/clamav/sbin/clamd --version
>
> ClamAV 0.90/2614/Tue Feb 20 20:53:11 2007
>
> i am using sendmail 8.14 compiled with milter support and also clamav
> compiled
On Sunday 20 May 2007 17:16, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Thomas Spuhler wrote:
> > Hello: I just joined the list and found this thread in the archive.
> > It seems, I have a very similar problem. Clamscan is using up to 100% cpu
> > and memory lately and sometimes cannot even ke
Hello: I just joined the list and found this thread in the archive.
It seems, I have a very similar problem. Clamscan is using up to 100% cpu and
memory lately and sometimes cannot even keep up with the e-mail flood.
It happened twice in about a month. I deleted all signature files, did a
freshcl
22 matches
Mail list logo
