>
>
> Indeed. The GPL is the very essence of capitalism, in my opinion.
>
> John
hm, i don't understand this. the GPL/LGPL construction is even more
'communistic' than the BSD license -- hey, that makes it very likeable
(both [L]GPL and BSD) ;)
cheerio,
thus Tomasz Kojm spake:
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 18:36:47 +0200
> Timo Schoeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>hm, but that's up to them. nobody here is responsible for things
>>people do (on the internet) reading this list.
>
>
> until they an
t;
>
> We don't need a help from people who distribute malware on their www
> sites (and even fail to properly classify samples).
hm, but that's up to them. nobody here is responsible for things people
do (on the internet) reading this list.
this would be different if they bro
R
> to slow or non existant help.
>
> You guys rock!
yip.
(but a slightly more kindly manner on this mailing list wouldn't harm.
the same is up to the postfix mailing list, e.g. ;)
>
> =
> Kevin W. Gagel
> Network Administrator
> Information Technology Services
>
with each four AV accels is much better
than having hundrets of mediocre performing GNU/L*nux (or any other)
boxens standing around which demand lots of space, generate a lot of
heat and administration demands, etc.
as always, YMMV. a small ISP may want to build a dedicated ClamAV
machine
sultant Sécurité
>>
>>Téléphone / Fax : +33-(0)3.44.39.76.46
>>Portable : +33-(0)6.24.40.95.03
>>E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>Securiteinfo.com
>>La Sécurité Informatique - La Sécurité des
>>Informations.
>>266, rue de Villers
>>60123 Bonne
worth it. Not to mention
> the time to market. If you use off the shelf PC, you
> automatically gets 2X performance every 18 to 24
> months. So why bother ?
i) an AV accelerator should be far superior (if designed well) -- you
can cast several nice things into this ASIC (or another form
rom time to time against an updated (!) pkgsrc tree, i.e. first run
cvs, sup or the way you like to update pkgsrc, and then run
pkg_chk -i
this will list available updates to packages installed.
(a bit OT, but...)
cheers,
--
Timo Schoeler | http://macfinity.net/~tis | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
//macf
uld be real soon though.
cheers,
--
Timo Schoeler | http://macfinity.net/~tis | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
//macfinity -- finest IT services | http://macfinity.net
Key fingerprint = F844 51BE C22C F6BD 1196 90B2 EF68 C851 6E12 2D8A
There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who under
too? My guess is that /something/ changed in the
> daily from 0.84 to 0.85, or it was a bug which may have been addressed.
> Your thoughts?
>
> -Eric
hm, i) building and installing clamav the 'normal' way does work on
NetBSD (of course ;), ii) please update your pkgsrc
mean by binutils?
that's no dumb question -- have a look at
http://freeware.sgi.com/Installable/make-3.80.html7
cheers,
--
Timo Schoeler | http://macfinity.net/~tis | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
//macfinity -- finest IT services | http://macfinity.net
Key fingerprint = F844 51BE C22C F6BD 1196 90B2 EF
this) or try sth.
like NetBSD's pkgsrc (www.pkgsrc.org), which is very convenient and up
to date :)
a minor issue on this is that the latter one still runs better on
MIPSpro than gcc.
>
> I suggest you direct IRIX-specific questions to comp.sys.sgi.admin.
> There are plenty of
it in you PATH).
gcc -V should get you something after that. and then you'll be ready to
build software with gcc.
cheers,
--
Timo Schoeler | http://macfinity.net/~tis | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
//macfinity -- finest IT services | http://macfinity.net
Key fingerprint = F844 51BE C22C F6BD 1196 9
;t have any compiler (on sgi e.g. gcc, MIPSpro)
on your machine, then you're lost.
so a compiler is mandatory if not installing a binary package (called
tardist on IRIX), thus a required component. that's not even a
metaphysic issue :)
cheers,
--
Timo Schoeler | http://macfinity.net/~tis
t;gcc" and "cc" and finds neither. Does anyone have any ideas?
>
> Scott
>
>
> ___
> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
>
check /etc/compiler?
--
Timo Schoeler | http://macfinity.net/~tis | [EMAIL
d more spam gets through (greylisting).
however, i think that greylisting is more focusing on fighting spam as
viruses have 'more time' (because they have more resources on the zombie
they reside and less targets).
(...)
>>
>>
>>Rainer
>
>
> Kurt
--
Timo Schoe
as in hardware (some
> high-end Sun boxes, I think). And it included spam filtering. But if I
> can get them to return it and switch to clamav/spamassassin, I'll do my
> best to get a $100k check to each team.
>
> Damian Menscher
keep the Suns -- there's nothing camparab
thus Matt Fretwell spake:
> Timo Schoeler wrote:
>
>
>>> Slight addendum. The unit is a Motorola RiscPC. Forgot that piece of
>>>somewhat required info :)
>
>
>
>>you probably mean PowerStack, which is a PReP model [1].
>
>
> I beli
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matt
hi,
you probably mean PowerStack, which is a PReP model [1].
i do have such a machine here, but i have no AIX that fits -- i only
have AIX for G5, unfortunately.
an option would be a cheap RS/6000 machine? mail me if someone wants
one, i can get those.
[1] -
s. The problem is not
> webmail - the problem is any content that is not scanned that user's can
> browse or download.
question of definition and scale of drawing the environment:
http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20050505.154118.95a76774.en.html
it should be off list, really
icy goes a long ways.
>
> Generally, before any of our users are silly enough to click on an web
> page with a blended attack, the anti-virus companies have found it. And
> we do have other protections in place.
cheers,
--
Timo Schoeler | http://macfinity.net/~tis | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
someone else.
> Period. Ingress is ingress, whichever path it takes.
>
>
> Matt
yip, that's what it all boils down to.
either scan every packet that makes it through your router (from layer 2
to layer 7) or restrict access to several (most?) services. including
webmail.
cheers,
--
und mail. It really isn't all that difficult.
>
> dp
your webmail may be configured to use your smtp servers. but i don't
think that company X is able to configure hotmail to use company X's
mailservers so that company X is sure that its employees use this safe
webmail... ;)
-
thus Daniel J McDonald spake:
> On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 14:12 +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>
>>thus Daniel J McDonald spake:
>>
>>
>>>On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 16:24 +0100, Nigel Horne wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Wednesday 04 May 2005 16:16,
gt; method.
partly agreed. if they want to be really secure, they should turn off
their routers and (email) servers and pull every plug out of any wallet...
>
>
> Matt
cheers,
--
Timo Schoeler | http://macfinity.net/~tis | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
//macfinity -- finest IT services | http://ma
ld' (viruses reading
this crap, frightening, and heading away of their' companies email
servers) and reality (nobody cares, just laughs). :D
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil
>
>
> Phil Randal
> Network Engineer
> Herefordshire Council
> Hereford, UK
cheers,
using
> web-mail.)
nonsense. there are application level proxies who do this. furthermore,
squid can do this with a few grips.
>
> Any company paranoid to force a disclaimer on every mail ought to
> similarly block webmail, if they have any intelligence.
--
Timo Schoeler | http://macfin
n you expect
> anyone to do that?
sometimes i think lawyers must be screaming of pain (caused by their
stupidity/silliness)... :D
cheers!
--
Timo Schoeler | http://macfinity.net/~tis | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
//macfinity -- finest IT services | http://macfinity.net
Key fingerprint = F844 51BE C22C
candid: {8} clamscan -v .
Scanning ./account_info-text.zip
./account_info-text.zip: Worm.Sober.P FOUND
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 34196
Scanned directories: 1
Scanned files: 1
Infected files: 1
Data scanned: 0.05 MB
I/O buffer size: 131072 bytes
Time: 3.962 sec (0 m 3 s)
can
y lies somewhere in between.
although it may be very important (esp. for clamav) to be up-to-date, no
admin would ever introduce new software (even a new minor version) into
a production environment without thorough testing before doing so.
and guess what? even a not-so-thorough testbed
ker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
hi,
commenting out 'NotifyClamd /var/run/clamd.pid' should be sufficient.
HTH,
--
Timo Schoeler | http://macfinity.net/~tis | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
//macfinity -- finest IT services | http://macfinity.net
Key fingerprint = F844 51BE C22C F6BD 1196 90B
31 matches
Mail list logo
