Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.72 Released

2004-06-08 Thread Stephen Gran
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 08:28:19AM +1000, Bill Maidment said: Todd Lyons wrote: Similar to this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat /etc/logrotate.d/clamav /var/log/clamav/clamav.log { create 644 clamav clamav weekly compress postrotate /bin/kill -HUP `cat

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.72 Released

2004-06-07 Thread Todd Lyons
Bill Maidment wanted us to know: Are you sure it's not still writing to the old file? If it was already Yep that was it. So I need to stop freshclam and clamd before logrotate and start them after logrotate? What a bore! Similar to this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat /etc/logrotate.d/clamav

RE: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.72 Released

2004-06-07 Thread Ron Snyder
Yep that was it. So I need to stop freshclam and clamd before logrotate and start them after logrotate? What a bore! Or log to syslog instead of directly to a file? -ron --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: GNOME Foundation Hackers

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.72 Released

2004-06-07 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 at 14:33:41 +1000, Bill Maidment wrote: Graham Toal wrote: Are you sure it's not still writing to the old file? If it was already open for write, and left open rather than opened/closed on every write, that's a definite possibility. Even if the file is rm'd, unix can

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.72 Released

2004-06-07 Thread Dennis Skinner
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 14:36, Todd Lyons wrote: Bill Maidment wanted us to know: Are you sure it's not still writing to the old file? If it was already Yep that was it. So I need to stop freshclam and clamd before logrotate and start them after logrotate? What a bore! Similar to this:

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.72 Released

2004-06-07 Thread Bill Maidment
Todd Lyons wrote: Similar to this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat /etc/logrotate.d/clamav /var/log/clamav/clamav.log { create 644 clamav clamav weekly compress postrotate /bin/kill -HUP `cat /var/run/clamav/clamd.pid` 2/dev/null || true endscript } Thanks

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.72 Released

2004-06-06 Thread Bill Maidment
Brian May wrote: Since it was not posted here, ClamAV 0.72 is available for download. Major bugfixes in this release include crashes with corrupted BinHex messages and some Excel documents. Protection against archive bombs (not fully functional since 0.70) was improved and a number of other

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.72 Released

2004-06-06 Thread Bill Maidment
Brian May wrote: Since it was not posted here, ClamAV 0.72 is available for download. Major bugfixes in this release include crashes with corrupted BinHex messages and some Excel documents. Protection against archive bombs (not fully functional since 0.70) was improved and a number of other

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.72 Released

2004-06-06 Thread Bill Maidment
Scott Truman wrote: The permissions on the new log file are probably wrong... Scott Do you see anything wrong with these permissions? Note that the previous file gets gzipped, so it can't get written to afterwards. Also note that when I restarted freshclam (nothing else) the log got updated.

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.72 Released

2004-06-06 Thread Bill Maidment
Graham Toal wrote: Are you sure it's not still writing to the old file? If it was already open for write, and left open rather than opened/closed on every write, that's a definite possibility. Even if the file is rm'd, unix can still let a process write to an open file. The space isn't

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.72 Released

2004-06-05 Thread Steven Stern
On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 22:25:14 +0200, Krištof Petr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael St. Laurent wrote: H... I went to the crash-hat repository and there are RPMs there with a timestamp from this morning but the filename is clamav-0.71-1.i386.rpm marketing fairytales We did run many

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.72 Released - binaries

2004-06-04 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
Brian May wrote: Since it was not posted here, ClamAV 0.72 is available for download. Major bugfixes in this release include crashes with corrupted BinHex messages and some Excel documents. Protection against archive bombs (not fully functional since 0.70) was improved and a number of other

RE: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.72 Released

2004-06-04 Thread Michael St. Laurent
Brian May mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ClamAV 0.72 is available for download. Major bugfixes in this release include crashes with corrupted BinHex messages and some Excel documents. Protection against archive bombs (not fully functional since 0.70) was improved and a number of other

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.72 Released

2004-06-04 Thread Kritof Petr
Michael St. Laurent wrote: H... I went to the crash-hat repository and there are RPMs there with a timestamp from this morning but the filename is clamav-0.71-1.i386.rpm marketing fairytales We did run many hard and time consuming QA tests to ensure the new version is stable enough for

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.72 Released

2004-06-04 Thread Steven Stern
On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 22:25:14 +0200, Krištof Petr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To tell the truth, I unpacked wrong tarball by mistake. Sorry. Fixed now. Thanks for point out that. Petr http://crash.fce.vutbr.cz/crash-hat/2/clamav/ is empty! (Thanks for your builds!) -- Steve

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.72 Released

2004-06-04 Thread Jim Maul
Quoting Steven Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 22:25:14 +0200, Krištof Petr [EMAIL PROTECTED] z wrote: To tell the truth, I unpacked wrong tarball by mistake. Sorry. Fixed now. Thanks for point out that. Petr http://crash.fce.vutbr.cz/crash-hat/2/clamav/ is empty! (Thanks for your

[Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.72 Released

2004-06-03 Thread Brian May
Since it was not posted here, ClamAV 0.72 is available for download. Major bugfixes in this release include crashes with corrupted BinHex messages and some Excel documents. Protection against archive bombs (not fully functional since 0.70) was improved and a number of other improvements were