Jon R. Kibler wrote:
Hi,
Running clamd 0.93rc1 on Solaris 9 Sparc.
Build it with gcc 3.4.6.
Running on Sol 9 Sparc, single cpu, clamd built with gcc 3.3.2:
Here's output from top from clamd after several days running:
PID USERNAME LWP PRI NICE SIZE RES STATETIMECPU COMMAND
Jon R. Kibler wrote:
Hi,
Running clamd 0.93rc1 on Solaris 9 Sparc.
Build it with gcc 3.4.6.
I know there was a recent thread on clamd memory
usage (that rapidly deteriorated into a discussion on
scanning email), but I never saw a clear answer to
the original question.
On 0.92, memory
Hi,
Running clamd 0.93rc1 on Solaris 9 Sparc.
Build it with gcc 3.4.6.
I know there was a recent thread on clamd memory
usage (that rapidly deteriorated into a discussion on
scanning email), but I never saw a clear answer to
the original question.
On 0.92, memory usage would start off around
Török Edwin wrote:
Jon R. Kibler wrote:
Does memory usage ever decrease?
I have never seen it decrease.
Suggestions to debug?
On Linux I would run clamscan under valgrind, and scan some samples (but
that is very slow).
Maybe a similar tool exists for Solaris?
DMalloc seems to be
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Jon R. Kibler wrote:
Hi,
Running clamd 0.93rc1 on Solaris 9 Sparc.
Build it with gcc 3.4.6.
Running on Sol 9 Sparc, single cpu, clamd built with gcc 3.3.2:
Here's output from top from clamd after several days running:
PID USERNAME LWP PRI NICE SIZE RES
