On Tuesday 22 June 2004 2:41 am, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 03:30:19AM +0200, Damjan wrote the following:
> > > However you cannot:
> > >
> > > - directly use the virus databases
> >
> > How come?
> > As far as I know, copyright law doesn't protect databases.
>
> You have
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 06:20:14PM -0400, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > > - link against libclamav
> > > - directly use the virus databases
> > > - include our code in your software (obvious ;-))
> > could he write a shim that is LGPL'd that links to libclamav?
> Well, I don't know. This is a question to
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 03:30:19AM +0200, Damjan wrote the following:
> > However you cannot:
> >
> > - directly use the virus databases
>
> How come?
> As far as I know, copyright law doesn't protect databases.
You haven't been keeping up. Congress is pushing really hard (if they
haven't alread
> However you cannot:
>
> - directly use the virus databases
How come?
As far as I know, copyright law doesn't protect databases.
--
damjan | ÐÐÐÑÐÐ
This is my jabber ID --> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <-- not my mail address!!!
---
This SF.Net email
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 06:20:14PM -0400, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > > - link against libclamav
> > > - directly use the virus databases
> > > - include our code in your software (obvious ;-))
> > could he write a shim that is LGPL'd that links to libclamav?
> Well, I don't know. This is a question to
On Monday 21 June 2004 04:04, Paul Smith wrote:
> We have a commercial product, which we want to keep commercial. It's some
> email server software, which has the capability to run an external virus
> scanner (currently it supports several commercial virus scanners)
> We tend to either use commerci
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:48:05 -0500
Jeremy Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 21 June 2004 04:04 pm, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > However you cannot:
> >
> > - link against libclamav
> > - directly use the virus databases
> > - include our code in your software (obvious ;-))
>
> could he wri
On Monday 21 June 2004 10:41 am, Paul Smith wrote:
> >IANAL. Take my answers below with a grain of salt.
>
> Of course :-)
>
> > > - our software supports 'shim' DLLs with a standard interface which can
> > > talk to a third party antivirus product to add the capability for more
> > > virus scanne
IANAL. Take my answers below with a grain of salt.
Of course :-)
> - our software supports 'shim' DLLs with a standard interface which can
> talk to a third party antivirus product to add the capability for more
> virus scanners without recompilation. WE could make one of those to talk to
> clama
On Monday 21 June 2004 04:04 pm, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> However you cannot:
>
> - link against libclamav
> - directly use the virus databases
> - include our code in your software (obvious ;-))
could he write a shim that is LGPL'd that links to libclamav?
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Admi
On Monday 21 June 2004 06:54 am, John Leach wrote:
> I don't believe talking to the daemon via TCP/IP (or even a socket)
> would be a violation [of the GPL], but along with Jeremy, IANAL (I can sleep
at
> night).
I don't see how it possibly could be. That'd be ludicrous.
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy Kit
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:04:39 +0100
Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have a commercial product, which we want to keep commercial. It's
> some email server software, which has the capability to run an
[...]
> There are several possibilities I've come up with:
> - add support for our soft
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 10:04 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> Sorry if this is a FAQ - I've searched and can't find anything about it
> anywhere..
I think this is more of a gpl FAQ
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html#GPL
I believe any linking directly or indirectly (via a shim as you suggest)
is
On Monday 21 June 2004 04:45 am, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> IANAL. Take my answers below with a grain of salt.
[snip]
> that would be horribly infectious. That's like saying "Ooo, I wrote an
> GPL'd for outlook, now microsoft has to give me their source!"
*cough*
GPL'd plugin.
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy
IANAL. Take my answers below with a grain of salt.
On Monday 21 June 2004 04:04 am, Paul Smith wrote:
> There are several possibilities I've come up with:
> - add support for our software to either load libclamav or talk to clamd
> directly, if those things are installed. This seems to me that we
Sorry if this is a FAQ - I've searched and can't find anything about it
anywhere..
We have a commercial product, which we want to keep commercial. It's some
email server software, which has the capability to run an external virus
scanner (currently it supports several commercial virus scanners)
16 matches
Mail list logo
