On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 04:24:59 -0400
D Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dns.c: In function `txtquery':
> dns.c:53: error: `C_IN' undeclared (first use in this function)
> dns.c:53: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> dns.c:53: error: for each function it appears in.)
> dns.c
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 10:07, D Walsh wrote:
> > What System / OS are you building on? What compiler and version?
>
> Mac OSX Server 10.3.5 (Darwin/FreeBSD)
> gcc 3.3
>
Ok, I think this warning:
chmunpack.c:175: warning: integer constant is too large for "long" type
is a result of new checks i
On Monday 13 Sep 2004 09:24, D Walsh wrote:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I./zziplib -I./mspack -g -O2 -MT
> message.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/message.Tpo -c message.c -fno-common
> -DPIC -o .libs/message.lo
> message.c: In function `messageToFileblob':
> message.c:1385: warning: passing
On Sep 13, 2004, at 04:34, Trog wrote:
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 09:24, D Walsh wrote:
They only problem with updating versions is when the tools required to
build the update change as well.
autoconf is only required to build devel/CVS versions.
I updated autocon to 2.59 (latest), ./configure went OK
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 09:24, D Walsh wrote:
> They only problem with updating versions is when the tools required to
> build the update change as well.
autoconf is only required to build devel/CVS versions.
> I updated autocon to 2.59 (latest), ./configure went OK but build
> produced some err
On Sep 13, 2004, at 03:03, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 16:58:46 -0500 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alex S Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 14:58, Jeff Smelser wrote:
On Sunday 12 September 2004 02:52 pm, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
Out of curiosity; when is a development vers
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 16:58:46 -0500 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alex S Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 14:58, Jeff Smelser wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 September 2004 02:52 pm, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> > > Out of curiosity; when is a development version considered a
> > > stable one? I
On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 14:58, Jeff Smelser wrote:
> On Sunday 12 September 2004 02:52 pm, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> > Out of curiosity; when is a development version considered a stable one?
> > I’m asking this because the latest stable is from the 30th of July. Are
> > there plans to release a stabl
Jeff Smelser wrote:
On Sunday 12 September 2004 02:52 pm, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
Out of curiosity; when is a development version considered a stable one?
I’m asking this because the latest stable is from the 30th of July. Are
there plans to release a stable version any time soon?
I thought Tom jus
On Sunday 12 September 2004 02:52 pm, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> Out of curiosity; when is a development version considered a stable one?
> I’m asking this because the latest stable is from the 30th of July. Are
> there plans to release a stable version any time soon?
I thought Tom just said not two
Out of curiosity; when is a development version considered a stable one?
I’m asking this because the latest stable is from the 30th of July. Are
there plans to release a stable version any time soon?
Regards,
Björn
---
This SF.Net email is spon
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 23:42:07 +0100
Wouter de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought the planning actually was to bring out a stable release
> before CVD?
There will be no more features before the stable release, we only need
to stabilize the new code now.
> There should be a new stable rel
ditto
I am using 20030926, it seems very stable though. I have been slacking
on the obsd port since I am waiting for a stable release.
I wish a stable release would have made it out before cvd
On Sunday, October 26, 2003, at 05:17 PM, Wouter de Vries wrote:
Hey,
I have seen you guys experim
Hey,
I have seen you guys experimenting with new database formats etc.
I was wondering when the next stable release is planned, and is the
current snapshot already useable for production?
Wouter
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.
I thought the planning actually was to bring out a stable release before
CVD?
There should be a new stable release at 1 november, so I can install it
on my clean 3.4 OpenBSD box :)
Wouter
Flinn Mueller wrote:
ditto
I am using 20030926, it seems very stable though. I have been
slacking on th
15 matches
Mail list logo
