[Clamav-users] Re: Two persistent problems with clamav

2005-03-09 Thread René Berber
Jerry Bell wrote: [snip] When I start up freshclam, I see this: freshclam daemon 0.83 (OS: freebsd5.2.1, ARCH: i386, CPU: i386) ClamAV update process started at Wed Mar 9 10:06:35 2005 main.cvd is up to date (version: 30, sigs: 31086, f-level: 4, builder: tkojm) daily.cvd is up to date (version: 7

[Clamav-users] Re: Two persistent problems with clamav

2005-03-09 Thread René Berber
Freddie Cash wrote: [snip] Looking at the log output, it looks like you have two separate processes running. One that wakes up every 30 minutes at 22 after and 52 after. The other that wakes up at half-past (at least, there's not enough log output to confirm the pattern). The entries are very

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: Two persistent problems with clamav

2005-03-09 Thread Mark
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > René Berber > Sent: woensdag 9 maart 2005 21:02 > To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > Subject: [Clamav-users] Re: Two persistent problems with clamav > > > How do you

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Two persistent problems with clamav

2005-03-09 Thread Jerry Bell
> How do you start freshclam, as daemon or manually to test it? It's sztarted as a daemon by a script. I have manually started it up with the same results. > > I don't agree with the library theory, it looks to me that you are > running at least two different copies of freshclam, one of them is t

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: Two persistent problems with clamav

2005-03-09 Thread Jerry Bell
> That sounds very plausible to me. :) Clever thinking. It might also > account for his permission problems (as the cron environment for that user > may differ). Trying "crontab -u clamav -l" might prove quite revealing. :) > I can say for certain that I did not put it into cron, and I have verif

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Two persistent problems with clamav

2005-03-09 Thread Freddie Cash
On March 9, 2005 01:33 pm, Jerry Bell wrote: > > How do you start freshclam, as daemon or manually to test it? > > It's sztarted as a daemon by a script. I have manually started it up > with the same results. > > > I don't agree with the library theory, it looks to me that you are > > running at l

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Two persistent problems with clamav

2005-03-09 Thread Todd Lyons
René Berber wanted us to know: >I agree with this, the log shows two different processes running, both >as daemon. >Could the start script run freshclam twice? No, when he upgraded from 0.81 to 0.83, it looks like the old process was never killed. It happily kept running. -- Regards...

RE: [Clamav-users] Re: Two persistent problems with clamav

2005-03-09 Thread Mark
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > René Berber > Sent: woensdag 9 maart 2005 23:52 > To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > Subject: [Clamav-users] Re: Two persistent problems with clamav > > > I agre

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Two persistent problems with clamav

2005-03-09 Thread Dennis Peterson
> > > > Could the start script run freshclam twice? > > Or could /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ contain two differently named > startup scripts? That would do it, too. :) > > - Mark Lacking any other problem, one of the two has to launch an earlier version of the tool in order to generate the error shown

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Two persistent problems with clamav

2005-03-09 Thread Dennis Peterson
> > René Berber wanted us to know: > > >I agree with this, the log shows two different processes running, both > >as daemon. > >Could the start script run freshclam twice? > > No, when he upgraded from 0.81 to 0.83, it looks like the old process > was never killed. It happily kept running. > -

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Two persistent problems with clamav

2005-03-09 Thread Jerry Bell
It appears this was the case. I knew it was going to be something so completely simple that I would be shamed from the list for a while, but I was so far in the forest, I couldn't see the trees anymore. BTW, I have no idea how that happened. I am pretty diligent about shutting things down before

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Two persistent problems with clamav

2005-03-09 Thread Dennis Peterson
Jerry Bell said: > It appears this was the case. I knew it was going to be something so > completely simple that I would be shamed from the list for a while, but I > was so far in the forest, I couldn't see the trees anymore. Fehh - like we all haven't been there before. Have a beer on me - hopef