On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 21:10:45 +0100 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Philip
Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running the Exim/Exiscan package that comes with Fedora Core 2
> (Exim-4.33 with exiscan-acl-4.33-20).
>
> I've just compared the clamd code between exiscan-acl-4.33-20 and
> exiscan-acl-4.3
Brian Morrison wrote:
I'm using Exim 4.43, with exiscan-acl-4.43-28, and all of my incoming
mail has the added X-Scan-Signature header that Exim adds in there to
show that the scanning occurred. I have seen no indication that this is
not happening and I can find nothing in my mail or Exim logs that
Trog wrote:
I've never used exiscan, but it sounds like a bug in exiscan (or a
configuration issue).
The issue started occurring (for several people on this list) between
0.80rc2 and 0.80rc3.
According to others, the change that broke it was
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/clamav/clamav-de
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 17:34:28 +0100 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can anyone else confirm that this is still a problem with 0.80rc4?
> >
> > Are the developers aware of this issue? Is there a fix pending?
>
> I've never used exiscan, but it sounds like a bug in exis
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 21:11, Philip Ross wrote:
> Philip Ross wrote:
> > Another change to the HAVE_POLL code in clamd/others.c has now been
> > checked in to CVS:
> >
> > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/clamav/clamav-devel/clamd/others.c?r1=1.18&r2=1.19
> >
> >
> > I haven't yet tried th
Philip Ross wrote:
Another change to the HAVE_POLL code in clamd/others.c has now been
checked in to CVS:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/clamav/clamav-devel/clamd/others.c?r1=1.18&r2=1.19
I haven't yet tried this to see if this fixes the problem.
I'm now running 0.80rc4 and am still seei
