-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Rudd wrote:
Sander Holthaus wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
This is a very naive or at least uninformed position to take on the
monetary significance of email.
The issue is that email never was designed to be used in that
particular
On Saturday December 30, 2006 at 07:26:57 (PM) Sander Holthaus wrote:
The issue is that email never was designed to be used in that
particular fashion. While it may be fast and almost instant in normal
circumstances, it was not designed with that in mind. The fact that
businesses do expect
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerard Seibert wrote:
On Saturday December 30, 2006 at 07:26:57 (PM) Sander Holthaus
wrote:
The issue is that email never was designed to be used in that
particular fashion. While it may be fast and almost instant in
normal circumstances, it
--As of December 31, 2006 2:30:51 PM +0100, Sander Holthaus is alleged to
have said:
I'm not saying that things should not evolve, I'm not saying that
email should not be instant or that businesses should not use it the
way they do. But the technology behind email hasn't kept up pace with
the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sander Holthaus wrote:
A tempfail is not a disaster in most scenarios. You may not be able to
receive mail until it is fixed, but you still get the mail after it is
fixed.
I think that attitude works fine in trivially small
Dave Warren wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sander Holthaus wrote:
A tempfail is not a disaster in most scenarios. You may not be able to
receive mail until it is fixed, but you still get the mail after it is
fixed.
I think that attitude works fine in
Dave Warren wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sander Holthaus wrote:
A tempfail is not a disaster in most scenarios. You may not be able to
receive mail until it is fixed, but you still get the mail after it is
fixed.
I think that attitude works fine in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Dave Warren wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sander Holthaus wrote:
A tempfail is not a disaster in most scenarios. You may not
be able to receive mail until it is fixed, but you
Sander Holthaus wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Dave Warren wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sander Holthaus wrote:
A tempfail is not a disaster in most scenarios. You may not
be able to receive mail until
Sander Holthaus wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
This is a very naive or at least uninformed position to take on the
monetary significance of email.
The issue is that email never was designed to be used in that
particular fashion.
No offense, but Dennis is right. You're being naive.
10 matches
Mail list logo