-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill Landry wrote:
Erez Epstein wrote the following on 11/26/2006 1:24 AM -0800:
Hello everybody,
i have set up clamscan to scan all of the server using cron daily
( /usr/local/bin/clamscan -r -i --exclude-dir=/sys --no-summary / )
the scan
René Berber wrote the following on 11/26/2006 1:26 PM -0800:
Bill Landry wrote:
Erez Epstein wrote the following on 11/26/2006 1:24 AM -0800:
Hello everybody,
i have set up clamscan to scan all of the server using cron daily
( /usr/local/bin/clamscan -r -i --exclude-dir=/sys
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 10:39:07 -0400, Miner, Jonathan W (CSC) wrote:
The utime() system call sets both access and modification times at the =
same time. If you were to only set one value, the other would be =
undefined, possibly ZERO! You need to use lstat() to read both values, =
prior to
Virgo Pärna says:
What about ctime - this would cause change in ctime value.
I'll take your word for it; I have not tested that.
I'm using AIDE (Advanced Intrusion Detection System) to monitor
my systems and among the things that AIDE saves to it's database
is file's ctime - if it's
Nevermind, I'm a dumbass.
I'm using the qmrocks qmail toaster and had a .83 rpm
installed. I installed the .86 tarball over it
without getting rid of the RPMs first. My binaries
were right version but I bet each binary was going
against different lib versions.
I backed everything out,
Dwayne Hottinger wrote:
Does clamscan automatically delete virus infected files if I run clamscan from
the server prompt? For example, If I run clamscan /home/* to scan all home
files will it delete the viruses found or just list them?
$ clamscan -h
Clam AntiVirus
Oversized.Zip
From man clamscan:
--block-max
Mark archives as viruses (e.g.
RAR.ExceededFileSize,
Zip.ExceededFilesLimit) if max-files, max-space,
or max-recursion is reached.
--max-recursion=#n
Brad Morgan wrote:
Using the lastest (Windows / Cygwin) snapshot available from Clamav.or.id
dated 3/10/2005, clamscan is reporting that it found the virus Oversized.Zip
clamscan --help shows a --block-max switch which I'm not using. I'm not
sure what limits its talking about either.
The zip file
- Original Message - As always, however, the most important
question is, are you running the
latest version of Blackhole? If not, the problem may be corrected in a
later version.
Matt
Matt
blackhole isnt being developed now ... we have done some changes to it to
get it to run
ahellary wrote:
- Original Message - As always, however, the most important
question is, are you running the
latest version of Blackhole? If not, the problem may be corrected in a
later version.
Matt
Matt
blackhole isnt being developed now ... we have done some changes to
it to get
Keith Patton wrote:
ahellary wrote:
... on our qmail...
Look at http://www.mimedefang.org
But MIMEDefang is a sendmail-only milter...
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
perl
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 7:51 PM
Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Re: clamscan and blackhole errors
Keith Patton wrote:
ahellary wrote:
... on our qmail...
Look at http://www.mimedefang.org
But MIMEDefang
ahellary wrote:
Matt
blackhole isnt being developed now ... we have done some changes to
it to get it to run spamassin 3.x
so i'll ask another question what are others running i like
black hole in that you can set which domains or even users mail is
scanned and even what incomming
I have mail folder name VIR that containts 43 mail attach with Netsky
and
2 mail attach with Bagle.
My FC1 has 0.83 and i do this :
clamscan VIR
clamdscan VIR
cat VIR | clamscan -
but it says no viruses.
Can anybody tell me why clam cannot found the viruses ?
Why? Because you don't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I have a mail folder, it's a file name VIR, and VIR is not a file folder /
directory.
Can clamav scan a file that is a mail folder ?
Aparently not. In fact it depends on the format used, if it hides the
message contents is not possible to decode it whitout knowing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have mail folder name VIR that containts 43 mail attach with Netsky and
2 mail attach with Bagle.
My FC1 has 0.83 and i do this :
clamscan VIR
clamdscan VIR
cat VIR | clamscan -
but it says no viruses.
Can anybody tell me why clam cannot found the viruses ?
Why? Because
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:12:01 +0200, Tim Ruehsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just wonder why 'clamscan --mbox' says OK whenever there is a 'X-Virus-Flag:
Yes' mail header line (a virus a definitely included). If I remove this
header line from the mail, the same command reports the virus
Weldon S Godfrey 3 wrote:
Hello, I am running qmail-scanner-1.20 with clamscan: 0.65. on a FreeBSD
5.2.1-RELEASE system. Everything worked fine until shortly before 2:40EDT
on 8/5/2004 in which every attachment that is scanned dumps core. I have
checked every permission, memory size setting I
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 11:20:45 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
Perhaps but I'm wanting to set up crontab jobs to specifically scan
certain directories and I don't want to have to specify every single
sub-dir.
clamscan -r /directory scans directory and all it's
subdirectories:)
--
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 11:12:24AM +, Virgo P?rna wrote the following because they
could:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 11:20:45 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
Perhaps but I'm wanting to set up crontab jobs to specifically scan
certain directories and I don't want to have to specify every
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 04:59:49PM +, Virgo P?rna wrote the
following because they could:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:17:46 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
Doh.
But you can use clamscan . to scan current directory ot clamscan
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 01:53:41AM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote the following because they
could:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 04:59:49PM +, Virgo P?rna wrote the
following because they could:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:17:46 -0600, Joseph A.
Nigel saved me with:
I just tried it and got this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ clamscan --mbox 3834.0.undetected.virus.mail
3834.0.undetected.virus.mail: Worm.SCO.A-dam FOUND
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 20742
Scanned directories: 0
Scanned files: 1
Infected files: 1
Data
Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 at 22:34:09 -0700, Starbane wrote:
[...]
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 41374
^
You've got some superfluous database files.
There are only 20718 signatures currently.
Maybe you've got old format database files
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 at 3:10:48 -0700, Starbane wrote:
Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 at 22:34:09 -0700, Starbane wrote:
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 41374
^
You've got some superfluous database files.
There are only 20718 signatures
After compiling 0.67, the segfault has gone away. After I wiped the
egg off my face, I felt much better.
Kudos to the ClamAV project team once again! :)
---
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps
26 matches
Mail list logo
