RE: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-10 Thread Michael St. Laurent
> RPMs (works fine on Fedora 1 and RedHat 9 at least) are available at > https://www.olen.net/downloads/clamav-20040204-1.i386.rpm > https://www.olen.net/downloads/clamav-milter-20040204-1.i386.rpm > > SRPM: > https://www.olen.net/downloads/clamav-20040204-1.src.rpm I was just wondering if you ha

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-05 Thread Nigel Horne
On Wednesday 04 Feb 2004 8:14 pm, Ola Thoresen wrote: > I have now tested the latest tar.gz from > http://www.clamav.net/snapshot/clamav-devel-20040204.tar.gz and can > verify that the problem with memory allocations on special binhex-files > has been fixed. > I have about 10 different files that

RE: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-05 Thread Tom Walsh
> > Hi, > > I wonder if i have to wait for the next stable version or use > the last cvs. I've download the last cvs of clamav and i'm > reading the changelog and found very interesting things > there. Is the current CVS is stable for an use in production > environment ? Is the next stable wi

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-04 Thread Matthew Trent
On Wednesday 04 February 2004 12:14 pm, Ola Thoresen wrote: > I have now tested the latest tar.gz from > http://www.clamav.net/snapshot/clamav-devel-20040204.tar.gz and can > verify that the problem with memory allocations on special binhex-files > has been fixed. > I have about 10 different files

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-04 Thread Ola Thoresen
Wed, 04 Feb 2004 at 00:23 GMT Ola Thoresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > Tue, 03 Feb 2004 at 23:26 GMT Matthew Trent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote >> On Tuesday 03 February 2004 03:09 pm, Nigel Horne wrote: >>> 4) Yes I am working on a solution and yes I am aware of it! >>> >>> I have just disabled b

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-04 Thread Thomas Lamy
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: Nigel Horne wrote: 4) Yes I am working on a solution and yes I am aware of it! I have just disabled binhex decoding in CVS while I further investigate this. A sidenote to everyone using the CVS version: It seems sf.net's public CVS service lags behind the develo

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-04 Thread Cedric Foll
Michael St. Laurent wrote: Are you using clamav-milter for the email scanning? No. --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. Februar

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Justin
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Brian Bruns wrote: > On Tuesday, February 03, 2004 10:35 PM [GMT-5=EST], Justin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/src/clamav/clamav-devel-20040201]#> make > > Making all in libclamav > > make[1]: Entering directory > > `/usr/local/src/clamav/clam

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Brian Bruns
On Tuesday, February 03, 2004 10:35 PM [GMT-5=EST], Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/src/clamav/clamav-devel-20040201]#> make > Making all in libclamav > make[1]: Entering directory > `/usr/local/src/clamav/clamav-devel-20040201/libclamav' > cd .. && \ > /bin/sh

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Justin
On 3 Feb 2004, Cedric Foll wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if i have to wait for the next stable version or use the last > cvs. > I've download the last cvs of clamav and i'm reading the changelog and > found very interesting things there. > Is the current CVS is stable for an use in production environ

RE: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Michael St. Laurent
Are you using clamav-milter for the email scanning? > -Original Message- > From: Matthew Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 8:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS > > >

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Ola Thoresen
Tue, 03 Feb 2004 at 23:26 GMT Matthew Trent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > On Tuesday 03 February 2004 03:09 pm, Nigel Horne wrote: >> 4) Yes I am working on a solution and yes I am aware of it! >> >> I have just disabled binhex decoding in CVS while I further investigate >> this. >> >> -Nigel >

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Matthew Trent
On Tuesday 03 February 2004 03:09 pm, Nigel Horne wrote: > 4) Yes I am working on a solution and yes I am aware of it! > > I have just disabled binhex decoding in CVS while I further investigate > this. > > -Nigel Doh, I must have misinterpreted comments in the Changelog to mean it's been f

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Nigel Horne wrote: 4) Yes I am working on a solution and yes I am aware of it! I have just disabled binhex decoding in CVS while I further investigate this. I had success with the patch produced by Thomas Lamy at least for the 2 message that I have - are there some issues with that one ? Stefan

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Nigel Horne
4) Yes I am working on a solution and yes I am aware of it! I have just disabled binhex decoding in CVS while I further investigate this. -Nigel -- Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter. NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.uk ---

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Nigel Horne
On Tuesday 03 Feb 2004 4:21 pm, Matthew Trent wrote: > Except for the huge memory leak that crashed > everything this weekend, it's been really stable. ;-) (Supposed to be fixed > now.) Just for the avoidance of any doubt, since there are a lot of incorrect rumours going around: 1) It is

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Matthew Trent
On Tuesday 03 February 2004 07:18 am, Cedric Foll wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if i have to wait for the next stable version or use the last > cvs. > I've download the last cvs of clamav and i'm reading the changelog and > found very interesting things there. > Is the current CVS is stable for an use

[Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Cedric Foll
Hi, I wonder if i have to wait for the next stable version or use the last cvs. I've download the last cvs of clamav and i'm reading the changelog and found very interesting things there. Is the current CVS is stable for an use in production environment ? Is the next stable will done quicly ? Reg