[Clamav-users] clamdscan : ERROR: Can't get absolute pathname of current working directory.

Hello! I'm using ClamAV 0.67 on AIX 4.3.2.0 with Sendmail 8.11.7 and Procmail 3.15.2 . I downloaded clamfilter.pl () and am using that to call clamdscan from within procmail. This all works fine if I invoke it from each individual user's .procmailrc .

Re: [Clamav-users] clamdscan : ERROR: Can't get absolute pathname of current working directory.

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 06:31:42 -0500 "Michael H. Martel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > however, I want to invoke it in /etc/procmailrc as a global for all > users. When I do this, clamdscan returns the error : Don't use procmail and clamav globally - such a solution is completely inefficient. You sh

RE: [Clamav-users] clamdscan : ERROR: Can't get absolute pathname of current working directory.

] clamdscan : ERROR: Can't get absolute pathname of current working directory. On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 06:31:42 -0500 "Michael H. Martel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > however, I want to invoke it in /etc/procmailrc as a global for all > users. When I do this, clamdscan ret

Re: [Clamav-users] clamdscan : ERROR: Can't get absolute pathname of current working directory.

--On Friday, February 20, 2004 5:33 PM +0100 Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Don't use procmail and clamav globally - such a solution is completely inefficient. You should scan the mail directly on the MTA level. You're suggesting something like the milter option yes ? Is it really going

Re: [Clamav-users] clamdscan : ERROR: Can't get absolute pathname of current working directory.

On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 06:46:45PM -0500, Michael H. Martel said: > --On Friday, February 20, 2004 5:33 PM +0100 Tomasz Kojm > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Don't use procmail and clamav globally - such a solution is > >completely inefficient. You should scan the mail directly on the MTA > >leve