- Original Message -
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clamdscan and clamscan behave different on
mailfiles?
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/clamavtest$ clamscan
> >
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/clamavtest$ clamscan
> /home/john/clamavtest/case1.eml: OK
> /home/john/clamavtest/20040801cases.tar: OK
> /home/john/clamavtest/case2.eml: OK
> /home/john/clamavtest/case3.eml: OK
> /home/john/clamavtest/case4.eml: OK
Shouldn't that have been (clamscan -mbox)?
Matt
---
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Koniczek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 12:27 PM
Subject: [Clamav-users] clamdscan and clamscan behave different on
mailfiles?
> hi,
>
> while running some tests with clamass
hi,
while running some tests with clamassassin i noticed inconsistencies between
mailscanning with clamscan and clamdscan.
test subject is a Worm.Klez.H infected mail extracted from a
well-known-and-hated mua (and then modified by different scripts, formail,
procmail etc. for internal testcases).
