On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 03:25, Trog wrote:
> Is that file an email? If so, RTFM on clamscan.
Maybe a feature could be if the first 4 bytes match the regex /From/
then clamscan could assume --mbox.
Blue skies... Todd
---
This S
Hi
When I uncomment the NotifyClamd option I get the following error.
freshclam daemon started (pid=23740)
ClamAV update process started at Thu Apr 22 09:04:05 2004
main.cvd is up to date (version: 22, sigs: 20229, f-level: 1, builder:
tkojm)
daily.cvd updated (version: 277, sigs: 951, f-level:
On 21 Apr 2004 at 9:49, Trog wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 09:37, Andrea Trasatti wrote:
>
> >
> > As you can see, clamscan catches the worm, while clamdscan doesn't. I checked more
> > than once and I only have one main.cvd and one daily.cvd. How do I get the
> > database
> > location of
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 10:51, Riccardo Ghiglianovich wrote:
> wow, I havw the exact opposite : clamscan does NOT detect, and
> clamdscad does it
>
> # clamscan 5279D9E6.39B
> 5279D9E6.39B: OK
>
> - --- SCAN SUMMARY ---
> Known viruses: 21162
> Scanned directories: 0
> Scanned file
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 10:26, Andrea Trasatti wrote:
> Thanks, I added/uncommented the SelfCheck. How should I configure The
> NotifyClam? This is what I have in my conf file:
> #NotifyClamd [/optional/config/file/path]
>
> Should I specify the clamav.conf path?
>
you shouldn't need to specify t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il giorno 21/apr/04, alle 10:37, Andrea Trasatti ha scritto:
Hello all,
I have posted a few messages about clamd not detecting some SomeFool
variants when scanning mail, but clamscan was detecting them.
wow, I havw the exact opposite : clamscan
Andrea Trasatti wrote:
Hello all,
I have posted a few messages about clamd not detecting some SomeFool
variants when scanning mail, but clamscan was detecting them.
While reading some man pages and the conf files, I found another binary called
clamdscan. I ran it and this is what turned out:
d
On 21 Apr 2004 at 9:49, Trog wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 09:37, Andrea Trasatti wrote:
>
> >
> > As you can see, clamscan catches the worm, while clamdscan doesn't. I checked more
> > than once and I only have one main.cvd and one daily.cvd. How do I get the
> > database
> > location of
Andrea Trasatti wrote the following on 04/21/2004 10:37 AM :
[...]
As you can see, clamscan catches the worm, while clamdscan doesn't. I checked more
than once and I only have one main.cvd and one daily.cvd. How do I get the database
location of clamdscan? Where should I change it?
Do you us
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 09:37, Andrea Trasatti wrote:
>
> As you can see, clamscan catches the worm, while clamdscan doesn't. I checked more
> than once and I only have one main.cvd and one daily.cvd. How do I get the database
> location of clamdscan? Where should I change it?
clamdscan sends th
Hello all,
I have posted a few messages about clamd not detecting some SomeFool
variants when scanning mail, but clamscan was detecting them.
While reading some man pages and the conf files, I found another binary called
clamdscan. I ran it and this is what turned out:
defender2 root #
11 matches
Mail list logo
